Congress needed just a week to throw a huge monkey wrench into the healthcare industry's plans for ICD-10 implementation. On March 26, House leadership introduced H.R. 4302, "Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014." By April 1, the bill had passed the Senate and been signed into law by President Obama.
Inpatient coders will see an entirely new coding system October 1 when they begin officially using ICD-10-PCS. However, MS-DRGs are not changing. The only thing that is changing is what codes map to a particular MS-DRG.
Physicians are never going to like receiving queries from coders and CDI specialists. They really won't like all the queries they will receive after the transition to ICD-10.
If you're not already actively using your hospital's PEPPER (Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report), you're missing out on a lot of valuable data.
As meticulous as a coder may be, he or she is bound to make a mistake at some point in his or her career. After all, nobody is perfect. Mistakes aren't necessarily a reflection on one's abilities or attention to detail. Coders know that physician documentation often makes the job much more difficult. Add stringent productivity standards to that, and you've got a potential recipe for disaster.
BCCS recently spoke with advisory board member Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, about the role of state HIM associations in ICD-10-CM/PCS coder education. The following is a summary of that conversation. Bryant serves as the president of the California Health Information Association (CHIA), which has approximately 5,000 members to date. For more information, visit http://californiahia.org .
When coding guidelines are murky and open for interpretation, coders can sometimes feel as though they're pinned between a rock and a hard place. Discussing the gray areas of coding during a coding roundtable not only helps relieve this tension, but it also helps to establish policies that ensure consistency and continuity.
