From an inpatient coding perspective, vascular dementia may be documented for hospitalized patients because it coexists with other acute or chronic medical conditions. Accurate coding of the condition and its associated risk factors and complications will ensure the patient’s overall severity of illness and complexity of care are fully captured. Note : To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
In December 2023, the Office of the Inspector General published a toolkit for Medicare Advantage organizations who submit high-risk diagnoses, and it announced in January 2026 that an audit will be conducted on high-risk codes that the organizations submitted for 2024. Nancy Reading, BS, CPC, CPC-P, CPC-I, reviews the high-risk codes and emphasizes what to look for in the documentation to support coding practices.
Recovery auditors and payers have demonstrated an eagerness to exploit what providers routinely state in the medical record to facilitate additional DRG validation and medical necessity denials. Therefore, knowing what should not be said in a medical record is worth reviewing. To illustrate, Trey La Charité, MD, FACP, SFHM, CCS, CCDS, lists 10 things providers should never be documenting in the medical record.
Modifier -59 is used to describe a distinct procedural service. It’s appended to codes to identify procedures/services that are not usually payable when reported together. Note : To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription.
The phrase “don’t reinvent the wheel” applies well to the development of an outpatient CDI program when a mature inpatient CDI foundation already exists. The challenge is not whether the wheel can be reused, but how to navigate the differences.
CMS is signaling a clear shift in how it views risk adjustment, quality performance, and documentation integrity. For coding and CDI professionals, this moment represents not a threat, but a critical inflection point.
