The 2027 OPPS and ambulatory surgical center proposed rule includes a policy that aims to expand CMS’ method of controlling unnecessary increases in the volume of outpatient services. Note : To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription.
Accurately telling the patient’s story requires a thorough review of the entire medical record to identify all conditions that were addressed during the encounter, whether directly or indirectly, by the provider.
Early outpatient follow-up was not associated with differences in hospital-free survival or risk of decline in health-related quality of life among older adults after acute myocardial infarction, according to a retrospective study published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine.
Established in 2000, the inpatient-only list has served as a catalog of procedures that can only be reimbursed by Medicare when performed in the inpatient setting. However, thanks to technological advancements and new surgical techniques, many of these services can now be performed in hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgical centers.
Our experts answer questions on navigating sepsis coding in an era of conflicting clinical criteria, evaluating abnormal renal function in the clinical record, and addressing payer denials that passed on queries.
A newly released Office of Inspector General report concluded that unclear Medicare requirements continue to drive inconsistent interpretations of inpatient rehabilitation facility documentation, coverage, billing, and coding rules, contributing to significant payment errors and compliance challenges.
Services provided in an inpatient setting are reported using two different coding systems. The facility reports procedures using ICD-10-PCS codes while the individuals providing the care report professional services using CPT codes. Terry Tropin, MSHAI, RHIA, CCS-P, provides a glimpse into how these two coding systems can work together in order to fully report inpatient services.
Kelly Rice, MSHI, BSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CRC, details how to differentiate and document between acute pulmonary insufficiency following surgery and acute respiratory failure following surgery. Identifying and discussing common clinical indicators for these diagnoses can help support documentation integrity efforts, reduced denials, and the inappropriate triggering of PSIs.
This article examines two examples—bone marrow transplantation and lung transplantation—to illustrate the similarities and differences in coding transplant encounters. These examples demonstrate how transplant coding is largely driven by transplant status, the reason for the encounter, and the presence or absence of transplant-related complications, while highlighting the unique coding considerations associated with specific transplant types. Note : To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
