This article is part two of a two-part series on the definition changes for sepsis. Reread part one in the October issue of BCCS. In my October Clinically Speaking column, we discussed the evolution of the definition of sepsis and its implications in clinical care (Sepsis-1, Sepsis-2, and Sepsis-3), quality measurement (CMS' SEP-1 core measure), and ICD-10-CM coding compliance.
The recent adoption of a refined version of the Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 90 composite by the Agency forHealthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has a significant impact on what discharges are included in PSI 15 (Unrecognized Abdominopelvic Accidental Puncture Laceration Rate).
The new guideline for code assignment and clinical criteria in the 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting does not mean clinical documentation improvement is going away; instead it just upped the ante for continued improvement.
Erica E. Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, writes about how using unspecified diagnoses in the inpatient world results in deflated quality metrics. Remer helps clinical documentation specialists remedy the situation and gives advices on how to aid providers in documenting to the level of specificity that is now needed.
Providers are still working to understand the impact of the February release of the controversial third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , tackles this new sepsis definition in part two of his two-part series.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, discusses a refined version of the Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 90 composite by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and how it has a significant impact on what discharges are included in PSI 15. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.
Trey La Charité, MD , writes about how he feels the days of merely maintaining compliance with published coding guidelines are gone, and suggests ways to protect a facility and appeal audits.
This October celebrates the eight month anniversary of the February release of the controversial third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , tackles this new sepsis definition in part one of his two-part series.
With all the hoopla over sepsis, pressure ulcers, and diabetes coding, there’s a little gem of coding advice that has been overlooked since ICD-10 was released: pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , writes about these changes and helps to decipher the new guideline changes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, writes about how certain hospitals will be required to participate in the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Model and a new orthopedic payment model called SHFFT if an August 2 proposed rule is finalized.
