Sharme Brodie, RN, CCDS, reviews 2017 First and Second Quarter Coding Clinic advice, which includes sequencing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with other respiratory diagnoses and body mass index reporting instructions.
James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , writes that if a payer has criteria that differs from that of the provider or the facility, Recovery Auditors can deny ICD-10-CM/PCS codes they deem not to fit these criteria. Kennedy gives solutions for coding compliance for conditions such as sepsis, coma, and encephalopathy.
All coders know that working with providers is not always a positive experience. It can be tough providing them education or getting responses from queries. Conversely, providers are busy and typically do not like anything to do with coding. When they hear coding they often take that to mean more work on their part.
Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , reviews changes that were made in the 2017 ICD-10-PCS Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting to arteries and stents. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.
With all the hoopla over sepsis, pressure ulcers, and diabetes coding, there’s a little gem of coding advice that has been overlooked since ICD-10 was released: pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , writes about these changes and helps to decipher the new guideline changes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.
Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each root operation, including Restriction and Occlusion. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Richard D. Pinson, MD, FACP, CCS , discusses the new Sepsis-3 definition and how the classification has been the subject of great controversy and consternation since its publication in The Journal of the American Medical Association.
We as coders, clinical documentation specialists, and compliance officers, are actively invested in coding compliance, aren't we? AHIMA and ACDIS emphasize coding compliance in their codes of ethics. If we aren't interested in coding compliance, why are we reading newsletters named Briefings in Coding Compliance Strategies and other similar publications?
