The fiscal year (FY) 2017 IPPS final rule was released August 2 and will be published in the Federal Register August 22. The majority of the finalized updates are consistent with those outlined in the proposed rule, but with a few refinements to applicable time periods. The final rule expands and refines the number of claims-based outcomes linked to payment under these programs. Let's review a few of the key changes to support your CDI program's strategic focus for the coming year.
Last month, I wrote about the role of coding and CDI compliance in ensuring the clinical validity of submitted ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, which impact payment, outcomes measurement (e.g., complications, mortality, and readmissions), and patient safety.
Q: During an ICD-10-PCS Fusion, when a physician documents the use of a “structural allograft spacer” in the medical record, what sixth character would we use when coding this? Some colleagues say to use A (interbody fusion) and some say to use K (nonautologous tissue substitute). What would be the correct way to code this?
Richard D. Pinson, MD, FACP, CCS , discusses the new Sepsis-3 definition and how the classification has been the subject of great controversy and consternation since its publication in The Journal of the American Medical Association.
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP , writes about how computer-assisted coding software can be used to boost coding accuracy and productivity, in addition to being an important tool for the remote coder.
Robert Stein, MD, CCDS, and Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, co-author this article that provides insights into how clinical documentation and reported codes may impact payments and offer guidance on some common CDI challenges to strengthening data quality. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
A study conducted by Johns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality finds that common measures used by government agencies and public rankings to rate the safety of hospitals, such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s patient safety indicators, and hospital-acquired conditions, do not accurately capture the quality of care provided.
While coders can choose among many CPT codes, provider documentation may sometimes not differentiate between similar options. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about some tricky procedures to distinguish and how coders can ensure they’re reporting which procedures providers actually performed. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
CMS is proposing to replace status indicator E (services not paid, non-allowed item or service) with two more specific status indicators in the 2017 OPPS proposed rule. The agency proposes status indicator E1 for items and services not covered by Medicare and E2 for items and services for which pricing information or claims data are not available.
Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CPCO, CCDS, reviews how CMS determines inpatient-only procedures and what changes the agency is considering in the 2017 OPPS proposed rule.
Q: Our surgeons perform a lot of blepharoptosis repairs. Because each patient is different, different amounts of eyelid tissue has to be removed. One of our surgeons wants to set a maximum amount that is included in the procedure and then charge a blepharoplasty to cover anything over and above this maximum. We are trying to figure out how to even start to operationalize this. It seems to us that this is just a “patient differential” in the surgery like you have in any other surgery. Is there any guidance or standard for this?
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, recap CMS’ proposed changes to packaging logic in the 2017 OPPS proposed rule, as well as plans for new and deleted modifiers.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, writes about recently proposed modifications to Patient Safety Indicator 90, and how a fact sheet released by the measure's owner, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, provides insights into what changes may lie ahead.
James Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , offers his take on AHIMA’s recently published clinical validation practice brief. Given that AHIMA is one of the ICD-10 Cooperating Parties, their practice briefs must be read closely, and if agreeable, incorporated into one’s compliance plan. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
CMS released the fiscal year 2017 IPPS final rule August 2. ICD-10-CM/PCS code changes and the addition of the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice had a starring role in the final rule.
Q: What exactly are diagnostic-related groups (DRG) 067 and 068 (nonspecific cerebrovascular accident [CVA] and pre-cerebral occlusion without infarct, respectively)? How do they differ from transient ischemic attack (TIA) or CVA?
Deciphering documentation is frequently the most difficult aspect of coding. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about what documented information coders can use to assign codes—and what to do when that information is lacking.
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, review changes in the 2017 OPPS proposed rule for providers to comment on, including site-neutral payments and comprehensive APC updates.
