Q: In ICD-9-CM we only have one type of Excludes note. ICD-10-CM uses Excludes1 and Excludes2. What is the difference between the two types of Excludes notes and how do they relate to Excludes notes in ICD-9-CM?
As more patients are being impacted by noncoverage of self-administered drugs, coders and billers need to know when and how to report drugs and drug administration services. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, discuss the differences in how drugs are paid under Medicare Part A and Part B.
Q: The rule our institution has followed with respect to HCPCS coded medications without a local coverage determination (LCD) is to limit prescribing to the FDA-approved indications. The question that arises is how closely do the physicians need to follow the package insert? For example, the drug basiliximab does not have an LCD and the FDA indication is: For acute kidney transplant rejection prophylaxis when used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen that includes cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Generally, physicians performing transplants at our institution do not use steroids or cyclosporine. They use tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or mycophenolate sodium. If the physician performs a transplant without cyclosporine or steroids, do we need to have the patient sign an advanced beneficiary notice?
CMS defines self-administered drugs as drugs patients would normally take on their own. In general, Medicare will not pay for self-administered drugs during an outpatient encounter or for drugs considered integral to a procedure. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how to determine whether a drug is integral, self-administered, or both.
As part of the 2013 OPPS Final Rule, CMS made major changes to how it will reimburse facilities for separately payable drugs and how it will calculate APC relative weights. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, review the most significant changes in the final rule.
Q: A patient went to the operating room under anesthesia for cataract extraction and repair of retinal detachment of the same eye. The surgeon successfully removed the cataract. The surgeon then accessed the back of the eye to begin to repair the detachment. After reviewing the condition of this eye area, the surgeon determined that the eye was in such bad shape it could not be saved, so the detachment was not repaired and surgery was ended. The patient was under anesthesia and the retinal detachment repair procedure was begun (although barely) but then cancelled. Should we report this procedure since the facility incurred expenses for the surgical attempt at repair?
CMS announced changes to reporting therapy services—the biggest operational change for 2013—in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule instead of the OPPS final rule. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain the changes to therapy reporting and molecular pathology coding.
Q: How should we bill for the physician in the following situation? A patient who has end-stage renal disease (ESRD) comes into a hospital’s emergency department (ED) with an emergent condition (dialysis access clotted or chest pain that is ruled out), but misses his or her dialysis treatment. Part of the treatment is dialysis performed in the ED or as an outpatient. The hospital bills G0257 (unscheduled or emergency dialysis treatment for an ESRD patient in a hospital outpatient department that is not certified as an ESRD facility) as per CY 2003 OPPS Final Rule guidelines and Pub 100-04, Chapter 4, section 200.2
As part of the 2013 OPPS final rule, CMS finalized a clarification to 42 CFR 419.2(b) concerning packaged services. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how this clarification could cause confusion in the future if hospitals are audited by third-party payers or by Medicare contractors who do not fully understand the intent of the language or how CMS develops payment rates.
Q: Is nursing documentation of completion of physician-ordered procedures, such as splinting/strapping, Foley catheter insertion, etc., sufficient to assign a CPT ® code for billing the procedure on the facility side in the ED?
Q: CPT ® code 85660 (sickling of RBC, reduction) has a medically unlikely edit of one unit. We test blood for transfusion for sickle cell before we provide it to a sickle cell patient. If we test three units of blood prior to administering the blood to the patient, which modifier is more appropriate: -59 (distinct procedural service) or -91 (repeat laboratory test)?
Q: What CPT ® code best describes the Bier block procedure? We are toiling over this and the most recent CPT Assistant says to use 64999 (unlisted procedure, nervous system). But the article referenced is from 2004. We just want to make sure there is nothing more recent.
Q: It appears that one requirement for using CPT ® codes 15002–15005 with application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is that the wound must be healing by primary intention. Can you explain this? We have never used these codes with preparation for vacuum assisted closure (VAC) placement, but it doesn't make sense, as NPWT is almost always used for wounds healing by secondary intention. Our physicians appreciate any clarification.
The rules for coding for facilities and physicians are basically the same for most services, but coders follow different rules for appending certain modifiers. Christi Sarasin, CCS, CCDS, CPC-H, FCS , Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC , and Peggy Blue, MPH, CPC, CCS-P, separate physician and facility rules for using modifiers -26, -TC, and -79.
QUESTION: I work for a gastrointestinal (GI) practice and I have a question regarding the correct sequence for adding diagnosis codes to a claim. I have advised our physicians and billers that the primary diagnosis code is always the reason for the visit. I am a little confused about the remaining diagnosis codes the physician will write down in no specific order. Billers will report codes in the order the physicians write down the diagnoses and not always the reason for the visit. For example, a patient is referred for a consult due to weight loss. The patient comes for the consult and the physicians may put down 787.29 (other dysphagia), 401.1 (benign hypertension), 783.21 (abnormal loss of weight), 787.99 (change in bowel habits) in this order and leave it up to the person entering the info to figure it out. I would report 783.21 first since that was the reason for the visit but then I’ve been putting the GI codes next and then anything else last. What is the correct sequence when adding diagnosis codes to a claim?
CMS proposed extending the delay on enforcement of physician supervision rules for critical access hospitals and small and rural hospitals with 100 or fewer beds for one final year as part of the 2013 OPPS proposed rule. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, and Jugna Shah, MPH, detail some of the more significant proposals for 2013.
Accurate reporting of observation services depends on a lot of factors. Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, and Cheryl Staley, RHIA, CCS, walk though five case studies to explain the ins and outs of observation coding.
