In part 2 of his series on medical necessity and coding, Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI, examines medical necessity and the 2-midnight rule using a case study.
The Official ICD-9-CM Guidelines for Coding and Reporting talk about the perinatal and newborn period as being the first 28 days of life. Robert S. Gold, MD, explains when neonatal really is—and isn’t—neonatal.
Coders now incorporate consideration of medical necessity when coding for inpatient admissions. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI , explains the importance of understanding the concept of medical necessity as it relates to coding.
The complexity of coding rules and the quality of documentation in facilities sometimes make correct DRG assignment a daunting task. Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, highlights current DRGs that are subject to Recovery Auditor scrutiny and provides tips for accurate DRG assignment.
Healthcare facilities are subjected to a myriad of auditorswho scrutinize everything from how many units of a drug were billed to whether or not a patient actually needed to be admitted to the hospital. Trey La Charité, MD , explains how to turn every denial into a learning experience.
Plenty of uncertainty surrounds the ICD-10 implementation delay, but healthcare organizations shouldn’t put the brakes on their plans. Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP , William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP , Monica Lenahan, CCS , Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, offer thoughts on how to keep moving forward with ICD-10.
Inpatient coders will have a new coding system on October 1, but they won’t have to learn new MS-DRGs. They aren’t changing. However, coders will see some shift in MS-DRG assignment in ICD-10. Donna M. Smith, RHIA, and Lori P. Jayne, RHIA, reveal why the MS-DRG shifts will occur.
Drug-resistant bugs are becoming more common as antibiotic use increases. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CPC-H, CPC-I, CCS-P , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explains why and how microbes become antibiotic resistant and compares ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM coding for these infections.
The audit landscape continues to change as Recovery Auditors expand prepayment reviews and CMS implements its new 2-midnight rule. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CPCO, Ralph Wuebker, MD, MBA, and Kimberly Hoy Baker, JD, review some of the recent changes to audit focus areas.
The ICD-10 implementation will result in a slowdown at every level of coding. Elaine O’Bleness, MBA, RHIA, CHP, Migdalia Hernandez, RHIT, Kimberly Carr, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, and Rachel Chebeleu, MBA, RHIA, provide suggestions on how to minimize that productivity decline.
The best way to decrease denials or increase overturn rates begins with a compliant concurrent review of documentation. Marilyn S. Palmer, DO, and Jonathan G. Wiik, MSHA, MBA, review common Recovery Audit targets and provide tips for successfully appealing denials.
No one is perfect, including coders. Mistakes aren’t necessarily a reflection on one’s abilities or attention to detail. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, and Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, highlight some common problem areas and provide tips for compliance.
Recovery Auditors audit the MS-DRG, principle diagnosis, any secondary diagnoses, and any procedures that affect—or could affect—DRGs. Christina Benjamin, MA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, reveals the most important documentation pitfalls and coding guidelines challenges related to MS-DRGs under auditor scrutiny.
Healthcare data continues to become the industry’s newest hot commodity. Ralph Wuebker, MD, MBA, and Yvonne Focke, RN, BSN, MBA, explain what information facilities can extract from PEPPER reports.
These days, the healthcare industry is all about the numbers, especially as pay-for-performance becomes more common. Lawrence L. Sanders, Jr., MD, MBA, and Simone R. Gravesande, RN, BSN , review how APR-DRGs work and why all coders should understand them.
The accuracy and completeness of coded data can potentially affect physicians more as the healthcare industry becomes increasingly transparent to consumers. William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, Timothy Brundage, MD, Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, Cathy Testerman, CCS, EMT, and Donna Walker-Thomas, MBA, RHIA, CPC, CMA, review how coded data relates to physician profiling and offer tips for engaging physicians in documentation improvement.
Although coders and billers don’t play a role in determining whether condition code 44 is appropriate, they certainly ensure correct billing of the code. Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, and John Zelem, MD, FACS, review the requirements for condition code 44 and when coders should report it.
Distinguishing between clinical and coding significance is often confusing. Joel Moorhead, MD, PhD, CPC, discusses how coders should differentiate between the two.
The three-day rule defines certain preadmission outpatient services as inpatient operating costs that are covered and paid under the IPPS. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, unravel the complex conditions associated with the rule.
Many organizations are concerned about the expected drop in coder productivity after the transition to ICD-10. Angie Comfort, RHIT, CDIP, CCS, discusses the pros and cons of using computer-assisted coding to help offset those productivity losses.
