The best way to decrease denials or increase overturn rates begins with a compliant concurrent review of documentation. Marilyn S. Palmer, DO, and Jonathan G. Wiik, MSHA, MBA, review common Recovery Audit targets and provide tips for successfully appealing denials.
CMS’ proposed 2014 OPPS rule is set to introduce many changes, such as more packaged services, including lab tests and add-on codes. Jugna Shah, MPH; Dave Fee, MBA; Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC; and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, offer their insight on what effect these changes could have for providers.
The 2014 IPPS Final Rule contains two significant changes that will impact coders: the 2-midnight inpatient presumption and the Part A to Part B rebilling. Marc Tucker, DO, FACOS, FAPWCA, MBA, and Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC, review the key provisions of these changes.
After a cerebrovascular accident (CVA, also known as stroke), a patient may suffer additional health problems, lasting after the event has passed. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, compares coding for these lasting effects, known as sequela, in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.
When it comes to ICD-10-CM/PCS, coders may be the hardest and most directly hit employees. Yet some experts say that aside from technical training, hospitals may be lagging behind in terms of actually managing the change for these individuals.
The 2014 OPPS proposed rule is shorter than normal at 718 pages, but the proposed changes are significant and probably the most sweeping changes since the inception of OPPS, says Jugna Shah, MPH, president and founder of Nimitt Consulting.
Diagnostic conclusion statements don’t sufficiently capture the clinical context and medical necessity for inpatient admission. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, discusses the importance of clinical context and quality of clinical documentation in the medical record.
Medical necessity establishes the foundation for evaluation and management (E/M) code selection and supports the need to services provided to the patient. Peggy Stilley, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, COBGC, ACS-OB , and Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explain how to define, determine, and defend medical necessity for E/M codes.
At first glance, codes for insertion, removal, and revision of pacemakers look quite different in ICD-10-PCS. Kimberly J. Carr, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, and Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, compare and contrast pacemaker procedure coding in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-PCS.
The AMA significantly changed how coders report cervicocerebral imaging in 2013. Andrea Clark, RHIA, CCS, CPC-H, and David Zielske, MD, CIRCC, CPC?H, CCC, CCS, RCC, discuss the changes and provide tips for coding these services.
