Physicians often use the acronyms IBS (which should indicate irritable bowel syndrome) and IBD (which should indicate inflammatory bowel disease) interchangeably even though they represent completely different conditions with different treatment and prognoses. Robert S. Gold, MD, and Drew K. Siegel, MD, CPC, offer tips on how to decipher documentation related to these two conditions.
What do cubism and coding have in common? Both can be viewed as art forms. Joel Moorhead, MD, PhD, CPC, details the three steps that the coding artist performs in reassembling medical record elements into abstracted form.
Diseases of the ear and mastoid process are moving up in the ICD-10-CM world. They’re getting their own chapter. In ICD-9-CM, eyes and ears shared a section. You’ll find diseases of the ear in...
We’re one step closer to knowing whether the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will actually delay ICD-10 implementation and if so, by how long. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)...
The dogs days of summer have arrived so the residents of Anytown descended on the dog park with their furry friends today. Sadly, not all of the puppies (and people) play well together and some of...
Inpatient facilities received mixed news on proposed changes to the list of complications and comorbidities (CC) and major CCs (MCC) in the fiscal year (FY) 2013 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) final rule , released August 1.
Physicians can perform three different types of wound debridement and coders will find different codes for each type. Gloria Miller, CPC, CPMA, and John David Rosdeutscher, MD, discuss the different types of debridement, as well as coding and documentation requirements.
Observation services can generate so much confusion that CMS actually asked for comments on observation and inpatient status as part of the 2013 OPPS proposed rule. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, help coders unravel the complexities of observation services.
As part of the July update to the Intergrated Outpatient Code Editor, CMS reinstated HCPCS C1882 to the list of acceptable devices for CPT code 33249. Dave Fee, MBA, explains the implications of the change and reviews code changes included in the update.
QUESTION: A patient complained of intractable pain from compression fracture (sustained the day prior to admission). The guidelines state if pain is not documented as acute or chronic, don't assign codes from the 338 category. Should we query the physician if the pain was acute or chronic rather than just using the fracture code if it appears that pain control was the main reason for the visit?
When a physician places a device that takes the place of all or some of a body part, assign a code from ICD-10-PCS root operation replacement (third character R). Think of a total knee replacement or...
Patience may be a virtue, but knowledge is power. Okay, enough clichés. The bottom line is we’re still waiting for a new ICD-10 implementation date. HHS published the proposed rule, moving...
In this month's issue, our coding experts answer questions about how to differentiate between modifiers -52, -73, -74, coding for negative pressure wound therapy, and billing the technical component of pathology services.
A surgeon performs a diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy before repairing a patient’s rotator cuff. The surgeon knew ahead of time that he or she would be repairing the rotator cuff. Should a coder or biller append modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) to the CPT® code for the diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy to ensure reimbursement for both procedures?
The sheer number and detail of new fracture codes in ICD-10-CM is daunting, leaving many coders to wonder-and worry-about whether physicians will document the information they need to assign the correct codes.
CMS released its latest MLN Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter, volume 2, issue 4 in July. The newsletter addresses common billing and coding errors, with the latest issue addressing frequently cited Recovery Auditors and Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) findings.
In this month's issue, we unravel confusion surrounding use of modifier -59, explain the difference between NCCI and MUE coding edits, discuss building E/M ED visit level, review the updates to the I/OCE, and answer reader questions.
HCPCS code C1882 (cardioverter-defibrillator, other than single or dual chamber [implantable]) will once again meet the criteria to override the device-to-procedure edit for CPT® code 33249 (insertion or replacement of permanent pacing cardioverter-defibrillator system with transvenous lead[s], single or dual chamber).
Coding for physician services doesn’t always match coding for facility services, which can cause problems for coders who code records for both. ED E/M is one area where different rules come into play.
