CMS released its FY 2014 IPPS final rule in August, and with it comes a whole slew of changes for inpatient hospitals. Set aside a good amount of time to scroll through the 2,000-plus page document. Yes, that's right: There are more than 2,000 pages of information to absorb before the rule goes into effect on October 1, 2013.
The best way to decrease denials or increase overturn rates begins with a compliant concurrent review of documentation. Marilyn S. Palmer, DO, and Jonathan G. Wiik, MSHA, MBA, review common Recovery Audit targets and provide tips for successfully appealing denials.
No one is perfect, including coders. Mistakes aren’t necessarily a reflection on one’s abilities or attention to detail. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, and Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, highlight some common problem areas and provide tips for compliance.
When it comes to ICD-10-CM/PCS, coders may be the hardest and most directly hit employees. Yet some experts say that aside from technical training, hospitals may be lagging behind in terms of actually managing the change for these individuals.
It took some time to break down the wall between coders and CDI specialists at New Hanover Regional Medical Center in Wilmington, N.C. However, that wall eventually crumbled. Linda Rhodes, RN, BSN, CCDS, manager of CDI, says an increased emphasis on communication and respect is what did the trick.
When Paul Belton, RHIA, MBA, JD, LLM, speaks about the culture at Sharp HealthCare in San Diego, you can hear the pride and enthusiasm swelling in his voice. Having served as the vice president of corporate compliance for the past 15 years, Belton has led the ongoing effort to ensure that all employees "do the right thing" at all times.
Recovery Auditors audit the MS-DRG, principle diagnosis, any secondary diagnoses, and any procedures that affect—or could affect—DRGs. Christina Benjamin, MA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, reveals the most important documentation pitfalls and coding guidelines challenges related to MS-DRGs under auditor scrutiny.
Healthcare data continues to become the industry’s newest hot commodity. Ralph Wuebker, MD, MBA, and Yvonne Focke, RN, BSN, MBA, explain what information facilities can extract from PEPPER reports.
Ancillary department staff may think they don’t need ICD-10 training, but they’re wrong. Lori Purcell, RHIA, CCS, and Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, offer tips for preparing ancillary department staff for ICD-10-CM.
Charging for inpatient ancillary procedures and supplies has always been confusing. "CMS provides very little guidance ... Its theory is that it's up to the provider to figure it out," says Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JC, CPC, director of Medicare and compliance at HCPro, Inc., in Danvers, Mass.
Do EHRs enable fraud and abuse by encouraging upcoding? What other factors could have led to higher levels of E/M coding over the past decade? Who or what organizations are responsible for ensuring compliance?
Coders will see plenty of changes when they start using ICD-10-CM codes. Many codes require more specific information, such as laterality, stage, or encounter.
When coding guidelines are murky and open for interpretation, coders can sometimes feel as though they're pinned between a rock and a hard place. Discussing the gray areas of coding during a coding roundtable not only helps relieve this tension, but it also helps to establish policies that ensure consistency and continuity.
These days, the healthcare industry is all about the numbers, especially as pay-for-performance becomes more common. Lawrence L. Sanders, Jr., MD, MBA, and Simone R. Gravesande, RN, BSN , review how APR-DRGs work and why all coders should understand them.
The accuracy and completeness of coded data can potentially affect physicians more as the healthcare industry becomes increasingly transparent to consumers. William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, Timothy Brundage, MD, Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, Cathy Testerman, CCS, EMT, and Donna Walker-Thomas, MBA, RHIA, CPC, CMA, review how coded data relates to physician profiling and offer tips for engaging physicians in documentation improvement.
Although coders and billers don’t play a role in determining whether condition code 44 is appropriate, they certainly ensure correct billing of the code. Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, and John Zelem, MD, FACS, review the requirements for condition code 44 and when coders should report it.
Nearly 75% of participating hospitals nationwide with RA activity reported receiving at least one underpayment determination, according to the AHA RACTrac survey, fourth quarter 2012, released in March. Sixty-nine percent of hospitals with underpayment determinations cited incorrect MS-DRG as a reason for the underpayment.
The three-day payment window has been wrought with compliance challenges since its inception. In January, CMS updated the policy to provide additional clarification.
Distinguishing between clinical and coding significance is often confusing. Joel Moorhead, MD, PhD, CPC, discusses how coders should differentiate between the two.
