Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CRC, CCDS, discusses the reporting of alcoholism, its key documentation details, and its effect on MS-DRGs in ICD-10. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription.
Providers often document “global developmental delay” in pediatric charts. The phrase is used to describe when a child takes longer to reach certain development milestones than other children the same age, such as walking or talking. Children with conditions such as Down syndrome or cerebral palsy may also have a global developmental delay.
Queries are definitely not what they used to be. When I first started as a CDI specialist, back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, the query process was a muddy exercise in creative writing. CDI specialists wrote all kinds of crazy things in order to get physicians to answer a query. Then in 2001 came the first AHIMA practice brief, “Developing a Physician Query Process,” which gave order and standards to the query process.
Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists bridge the gap between physicians and coders. This article takes a look at the benefits of CDI and coding collaboration, and how CDI specialists can address coding hot topics at their own facilities.
Peggy S. Blue, MPH, CPC, CCS-P, CEMC , writes about hemophilia and how this condition is important for inpatient coders to understand since incorrect reporting can affect MS-DRG assignment.
Erica E. Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS , comments on a recent Coding Clinic that has garnered a lot of questions on inpatient obstetrics coding and gives advice on how she thinks this new guidance is flawed. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription.
Long before ICD-10 became a focus, working as a clinical documentation improvement manager with physicians to improve their progress and/or operative notes was a challenge—doctors either got it or they didn’t. But as the transition from paper charts to an electronic medical record began, providers started to understand how to better document their visits, since they had to choose from drop-down menus and multiple options to complete their notes.
Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each definition. This article takes a look at the root operations Drainage, Extirpation, and Fragmentation. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription.
Trey La Charité, MD, discusses the importance of monitoring your facility’s case-mix index, and how evaluating each component of a case-mix index allows you to narrow your focus and to hone in on all of the factors that might be affecting them.
James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , reviews recent coding audits at that Northside Medical Center of Youngstown, Ohio, and Vidant Medical Center of Greenville, North Carolina, and gives readers tips on how to better prepare their facilities through these examples.
The incidence of stroke and transient ischemic attack is increasing as the baby-boomer population ages. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , writes that understanding and embracing clinical and coding fundamentals for these conditions is essential in the joint effort to promote providers’ complete documentation and the coder’s assignment of clinically valid codes.
Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, CDIP , explains how external coding audits are an important part of shining a light into all coding operations and turning risk into security and peace of mind. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription.
In today’s ever-changing healthcare landscape, emphasis is shifting away from fee-for-service to pay-for-performance, from volume-based care to value-based reimbursement, and from case-mix index to outcome measures.
The selection of the principal diagnosis is one of the most important steps when coding an inpatient record. The diagnosis reflects the reason the patient sought medical care, and the principal diagnosis can drive reimbursement.
The human eye may be small, but it’s one of the most complex organ systems in the body. Review the anatomy of the eye and how to code for conditions affecting the system, including new details for 2017.
Red letter days in coding compliance occurred in December 2016 and January 2017 with the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) release of two audit reports. These reports asserted that Northside Medical Center of Youngstown, Ohio, and Vidant Medical Center of Greenville, North Carolina, improperly submitted ICD-9-CM codes for marasmus and severe malnutrition.
Erica E. Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS , explains what clinical validation denials are, how they are determined, and how a coder can help to limit these rebuffs.
Amber Sterling, RN, BSN, CCDS , and Jana Armstrong, RHIA, CPC , discuss revenue integrity and how it focuses on three operational pillars: clinical coding, clinical documentation improvement, and physician education.
Clinical documentation improvement managers discuss their management duties and program priorities and how they strive for the best possible results at their facility.
James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, discusses bundled payments and the importance of applying proper ICD-10-CM/PCS-pertinent documentation and coding principles to remain compliant.
Crystal R. Stalter, CPC, CCS-P, CDIP, writes about how fully specified documentation is the key to quality care, compliance, and eventual reimbursement, and how documentation software can help to streamline these processes.
The 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting brought many changes and updates for coders, and present-on-admission (POA) reporting was not excluded. Completely understanding POA guidelines is necessary for any inpatient coder.
Clinical validation denials (CVD) result from a review by a clinician, such as a registered nurse, contractor medical director, or therapist, who concludes retrospectively that a patient was not really afflicted by a condition that was documented in the medical record and coded by the coder.
Optimal ICD-10 accuracy cannot be achieved by simply looking up a code in an encoder or book. Knowing the rationale for what you are coding, why you are applying one code versus another, and having the knowledge base to correctly apply the 2017 Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting are the ingredients necessary for accurate clinical coding.
In promoting ICD-10-CM coding integrity and compliance, cerebrovascular disease represents one of the greatest challenges for providers and coders alike. It seems that clinicians, ICD-10-CM, and risk-adjusters (those who create the DRG system), do not sing the same tune.
The advent of the electronic record changed (EHR) how clinical documentation improvement specialists work with providers and coders. As more healthcare organizations take on the arduous process of implementing an EHR, new challenges and considerations arise.
Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, writes about the new round of Recovery Auditor (RA) contracts, and how even the most experienced RA response team will need to understand the new challenges providers face with CMS’ 2017 changes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, reviews important coding recommendations mentioned in various Medicare Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletters, covering the MS-DRG postacute discharge policy, readmissions to the same hospital on the day of discharge, and postoperative respiratory failure.
One of my favorite sayings when teaching clinical documentation integrity, as well as coding, is that a good lawyer knows the law, but a better lawyer knows the law, the judge, and the jury. In learning the judge and the jury, one of my favorite references is the Medicare Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter , an official CMS publication written in plain language that serves as a summary of how Medicare and its contractors interpret the Medicare rules, regulations, and policy statements.
James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, says that since the clinical intent and language of physicians does not translate into the administrative language of ICD-10-CM, understanding and embracing both their clinical foundations is essential to accurately measure outcomes and ensure coding compliance.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, explains that pneumonia discharges impact hospital payments under the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, as well as the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program, and conveys what CDI teams can do to help.
Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, CHPS , writes about how one of the many coder obligations is to report noncompliant activities and provides information on how to do this anonymously. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
Pneumonia discharges impact hospital payments under the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, as well as the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.
Trey La Charité, MD, FACP, CCDS , notes that getting a handle on a facilities’ case-mix index (CMI) fluctuations can be difficult, and shares insights to how CDI teams can handle these CMI difficulties.
Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , writes about how the selection of the code and a principal diagnosis seems fairly straightforward, but there are multiple factors that must be considered and reviewed before a coder can assign a certain diagnosis as principal.
The 30-day all cause acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality outcome measure has been linked to hospital payments since the inception of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP) in fiscal year 2013. In February 2016, CMS announced that 70% of commercial payers have agreed to use this measure as one of the cardiology outcomes linked to payment.
The world didn’t end on October 1, 2015. After years of postponement, the proverbial “deal with the devil” made between CMS and the AMA to push ahead with ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation was a year’s grace period during which physician practices could continue using unspecified codes without worrying about Medicare denials or auditor reviews.
After a year full of numerous coding changes, Laurie L. Prescott, RN, MSN, CCDS, CDIP , takes a closer look at 12 new guidelines that will affect CDI and helps coders better understand these recommendations.
Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each definition. This article takes a look at the root operations Inspection, Map, Dilation, and Bypass. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.
CMS announced that 70% of commercial payers have agreed to use the 30-day all cause acute myocardial infarction mortality outcome measure as one of the cardiology outcomes linked to payment. Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS , writes about how CDI teams can best prepare for these upcoming changes.
Now that we’ve had over a year to get comfortable with our ICD-10-PCS manuals, the 2017 updates to the guidelines and tables turned a lot of what we learned onto its ear. The update brought 3,827 changes to ICD-10-PCS, with the majority of the changes occurring in the heart and great vessels section of the manual. Redefined body part characters, as well as additions of new device characters, left inpatient coders wondering: What does this all mean and how am I supposed to code it?
Bronchopulmonary infections, such as acute bronchitis and pneumonia, are frequent reasons for physician and facility encounters. These encounters result in ICD-10-CM code assignments that factor greatly in severity and risk adjustment inherent to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the recently implemented Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015.
