Upon quick glance, codes for insertion, removal, and revision of pacemakers look quite different in ICD-10-PCS. The good news is that much of the logic that coders use to assign these codes in ICD-9-CM won't change. The silver lining? The procedure itself doesn't change, nor does anatomy.
Hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP). It's the latest buzz phrase in the healthcare industry, and it's something in which all insurers are interested.
Charging for inpatient ancillary procedures and supplies has always been confusing. "CMS provides very little guidance ... Its theory is that it's up to the provider to figure it out," says Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JC, CPC, director of Medicare and compliance at HCPro, Inc., in Danvers, Mass.
Q: What advice can you offer for sequencing pulmonary edema and congestive heart failure when both appear to meet the definition of principal diagnosis?
E codes are important in a variety of settings. Pamela L. Owens, PhD, Kathy Vermoch, MPH, Leslie Prellwitz, MBA, CCS, CCS-P, and Suzanne Rogers, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, explain the importance of reporting E codes and why every facility should have an internal coding policy that includes E codes.
Q: How will I report the initial insertion of a dual-chamber pacemaker device in ICD-10-PCS? The physician inserted two leads—one into the atrium and one into the ventricle–using a percutaneous approach into the patient’s chest.
Most hospitals have been overwhelmed by Recovery Auditor (RA) requests for documentation. So it's no surprise that the RAs themselves seem to be equally as burdened with the task of processing those records.
Consider the following: A beneficiary is admitted to a hospital pursuant to a physician order and receives medically necessary care spanning at least two midnights. CMS will consider this appropriate for payment under Medicare Part A, according to the FY 2014 IPPS proposed rule released April 26. Actuaries estimate that this proposal for what constitutes appropriate inpatient care would increase IPPS expenditures by $220 million due to an expected net increase in inpatient encounters. CMS proposes a 2% reduction to offset projected spending increases.
Auto manufacturers rely on them to make decisions about improving passenger restraints in vehicles. Industrial engineers may reference them when advocating for improved design of staircases to prevent falls. Drug companies use them to bolster support for child-resistant packaging.
CMS and auditors are increasing scrutiny of CCs and MCCs. William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, provides tips that coders can use to look for clinical evidence in the record before querying for these targeted conditions.
CMS not only redefines inpatient status in the 2014 IPPS proposed rule, but it also discusses the ‘why’ and ‘how’ physicians should document the defining characteristic of all admissions: medical necessity. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, and Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP, explain how the proposals could impact inpatient admissions.
Under a new ruling, CMS allows full Part B payment for inpatient stays that a contractor denies because it deems them to be not reasonable and necessary. David Danek and Ann Marshall, both from CMS, explain how the rebilling works under the ruling and what will be different under a simultaneously released proposed rule.
Q: A surgeon’s dictated report for a right hip hemiarthroplasty states the following: Of note, while drilling one of our transosseous suture holes with a 2.0 mm drill bit, the end of the drill bit broke off inside of the trochanter. It seemed to be quite deep into the bone and was not retrievable. As such, it was left in place. Should we report 998.4 (foreign body accidentally left during a procedure) for this case?
Coders should question the validity of coding advice and work collaboratively with physicians to develop sound coding guidelines. Last month, I addressed coding advice related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy and cardiorenal syndrome. This month, I’ll address coding advice related to several other conditions.
In February, AHIMA published an update to its 2010 query practice brief. The updated brief, Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice, is the result of a joint effort between AHIMA and the Association for Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists (ACDIS). ?
DRGs for procedures unrelated to the principal diagnosis should occur rarely. Robert S. Gold, MD, and Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP, explain when it is appropriate to report an unrelated DRG.
Q: Using the ICD-10-CM guidelines for the seventh character extensions for fracture codes, how should I identify each of the following? Avascular necrosis following fracture Cast change or removal Emergency treatment Evaluation and management by a new physician Follow-up visits following fracture treatment Infection on open fracture site Malunion of fracture Nonunion of fracture Medication adjustment Patient delayed seeking treatment for the fracture or nonunion Removal of external of internal fixation device Surgical treatment
