CMS recently released five online resources to aid providers in their ICD-10 implementation efforts. Although CMS designed some of these resources with providers in mind, much of the information is applicable to hospitals, payers, and vendors as well.
Coding for podiatry services requires an extensive understanding of complex anatomy and regulations. Lynn M. Anderanin, CPC, CPC-I, COSC , AAPC Certified ICD-10-CM instructor, AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM trainer, reviews what steps coders can make to ensure complete documentation for podiatry services that are facing increasing audits.
The 2014 IPPS Final Rule was supposed to be implemented with enforcement beginning October 1, but one of its most controversial aspects has seen another delay in enforcement, with major healthcare trade groups seeking more.
Q: We recently had a situation where a patient had come in to have his port re-assessed. He had been complaining of the port being difficult to access. Preliminary x-ray showed the port accessed, with great blood return. Patient has an allergy to IV contrast, so we just flushed the port, and did not give the contrast. The port remained accessed. How do we code this? Do we use 36598 (contrast injection[s] for radiologic evaluation of existing central venous access device, including fluoroscopy, image documentation and report) with a modifier -52 (reduced services)? The other option is a modifier -73 (discontinued outpatient procedure prior to anesthesia administration) or -74 (discontinued outpatient procedure after anesthesia administration). However we have no documentation regarding anesthesia, and I'm not sure the patient would even get anesthesia for a procedure such as this.
ICD-10-CM codes may look completely different, but many of the coding steps remain the same. Betty Hovey, CPC, CPC-H, CPB, CPMA, CPC-I, CPCD; Julia Palmer, MBA, RHIA, CCS ; and Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, CDIP, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer explain how to code for neoplasms in ICD-10 and which changes to note.
Packaging still causes confusion amongst healthcare providers and the number of packaged services will greatly expand if CMS finalizes certain parts of the 2014 OPPS proposed rule. Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, and Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC , discuss what changes could come in 2014 and how to avoid common packaging errors.
Small and mid-sized hospitals are increasing their ICD-10 training for staff, according to a recent Health Revenue Assurance Associates (HRAA) survey of 200 healthcare professionals. However, many still lag behind CMS’ timeline for dual coding and other implementation aspects.
Some of the most sweeping changes in OPPS history were proposed in the 2014 rule, including new packaging rules, quality measures, and changes to evaluation and management. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Dave Fee, MBA, look at some of the changes and how they could impact providers.
New CPT ® codes introduced for 2014 will give healthcare providers new ways to report pain management services and treatments. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, MAOM/HSM, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer , reviews some of the codes, including new evaluation and management and Category II codes.
Q: The patient has had a previous bilateral mastectomy and is now coming in for a revision of bilateral areola with a dermal fat graft to the left nipple and excision of excessive skin and subcutaneous tissue from both breasts. This would be CPT ® code 19380 (revision of reconstructed breast) with modifier -50 (bilateral procedure) and 19350-50 (nipple/areola reconstruction) for both procedures. I cannot locate information that tells me if the nipple revision on the reconstructed breast is part of the 19380 or can be separately coded with 19350.
Like the skin, dermatology coding has several layers. Betty Hovey, CPC, CPC-H, CPB, CPMA, CPC-I, CPCD, says that coders need to pay attention to the type of procedure, site, size, and more in order to accurately report each encounter.
The implementation of ICD-10-CM will bring more specificity to coding, which will mean more data for facilities. Michael Gallagher, MD, MBA, MPH, and Andrea Clark, RHIA, CCS, CPC-H, look at how to handle that data and its benefits for providers and patients.
Jeanne L. Plouffe, CPC, CGSC , and Jennifer Avery, CCS, CPC-H, CPC, CPC-I , review procedures performed on the gallbladder and how to determine the correct ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes.
With less than a year until ICD-10 implementation, many facilities have yet to even begin training. A recent Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists survey shows how far along facilities are and their concerns as October 1, 2014, nears.
CMS’ proposed 2014 OPPS rule is set to introduce many changes, such as more packaged services, including lab tests and add-on codes. Jugna Shah, MPH; Dave Fee, MBA; Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC; and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, offer their insight on what effect these changes could have for providers.
Q: A patient comes into the ED with chest pain. An EKG (CPT® code 93005) is performed. The patient goes directly to the catheterization lab for catheterization (code 93454). Is a modifier appropriate for the EKG?
Coding may not be brain surgery, but understanding brain anatomy can greatly help coders when reporting head injuries or disorders. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, reviews some major components of brain anatomy and the impact of ICD-10-CM on coding for some common diagnoses.
Modifiers are sometimes essential to ensure proper payment, but choosing the correct one can be tricky. Sarah L. Goodman, MBA, CHCAF, CPC-H, CCP, FCS; Katherine Abel, CPC, CPMA, CEMC, CPC-I; and Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, discusssome confusing modifiers and how to use them accurately.
Some providers are billing only add-on codes without their respective primary codes, resulting in overpayments, according to CMS. Add-on codes billed without their primary codes are considered an overpayment, with one exception.
Q: We have a patient with documented age-related osteoporosis. She bent over to pick up a newspaper from a table and fractured a vertebrae. Should we code the fracture as pathologic or traumatic?
After a cerebrovascular accident (CVA, also known as stroke), a patient may suffer additional health problems, lasting after the event has passed. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, compares coding for these lasting effects, known as sequela, in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.
When it comes to ICD-10-CM/PCS, coders may be the hardest and most directly hit employees. Laura A. Shaffer, PhD, and Monica Lenahan, CCS, explain how hospitals may be lagging behind in terms of actually managing the change for these individuals.
CMS’ Pat Brooks, RHIA, senior technical advisor, Hospital and Ambulatory Policy Group, and AHIMA’s Sue Bowman, MJ, RHIA, CCS, FAHIMA, senior director, coding policy and compliance, reviewed basic ICD-10 information during a CMS National Provider Call August 22.
CMS added three new HCPCS C codes and one G code to the integrated outpatient code editor (I/OCE) as part of the October quarterly update. The new codes are effective October 1.
Medical necessity establishes the foundation for evaluation and management (E/M) code selection and supports the need to services provided to the patient. Peggy Stilley, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, COBGC, ACS-OB , and Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explain how to define, determine, and defend medical necessity for E/M codes.
Q: The patient comes in for a cardioversion, but the international normalized ratio results were unsatisfactory. The physicians canceled the cardioversion. Would modifier -73 (discontinued outpatient/hospital ambulatory surgery center procedure prior to the administration of anesthesia) be appropriate?
One of the bigger challenges with the birth of the new ICD-10-CM coding system is the assignment of the letter O as the leading indicator for OB/GYN codes. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, ICD-10-CM/PCS AHIMA-accredited trainer, delivers a comparative look at coding for OB/GYN coding in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.
Evaluation and management (E/M) coding and reimbursement for hospital outpatients could change dramatically if CMS finalizes its proposal to replace current E/M CPT ® codes with three G codes. Dave Fee, MBA, Peggy S. Blue, MPH, CCS-P, CPC, Jugna Shah, MPH, Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and Valerie A. Rinkle discuss the possible impact if CMS finalizes its proposal.
In January 2013, CMS introduced 42 therapy functional reporting G codes (nonpayable), but instituted a six-month trial period. That grace period ended July 1. Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H, Dave Fee, MBA, and Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, explain how to report these G codes and their related functional modifiers.
The AMA significantly changed how coders report cervicocerebral imaging in 2013. Andrea Clark, RHIA, CCS, CPC-H, and David Zielske, MD, CIRCC, CPC?H, CCC, CCS, RCC, discuss the changes and provide tips for coding these services.
CMS has been gathering information about the use of observation services and short inpatient hospital stays because hospitals have been placing patients in observation for longer periods of time. CMS recently finalized a change that will substantially affect how hospitals bill for observation stays, long outpatient stays, and short inpatient stays.
Q: A clinician goes to a patient's home and does not perform an evaluation and management, but performs a catheter replacement. How should we code this encounter?
Medical necessity is as simple as it sounds and it isn’t important just for inpatients. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, reviews the importance of establishing medical necessity for outpatient services.
Coders append modifiers to claims every day, but use some modifiers less frequently than others. Lori- Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, discusses the proper use of two less common modifiers, modifiers -62 and -66.
Coding debridement of ulcers requires that coders know the type, location, and depth of the ulcer and the treatment provided. Gloria Miller, CPC, and Robert S. Gold, MD, review the clinical and coding aspects of ulcer debridement.
The U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently posted the updated ICD-10-CM guidelines . Narrative changes in the guidelines appear in bold text and content that moved within the guidelines is underscored.
CMS’ July update to the Integrated Outpatient Code Editor features new codes, new APCs, and a new modifier. Dave Fee, MBA, explains the most noteworthy changes for this quarter.
Ancillary department staff may think they don’t need ICD-10 training, but they’re wrong. Lori Purcell, RHIA, CCS, and Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, offer tips for preparing ancillary department staff for ICD-10-CM.
The upcoming transition to ICD-10 is a great opportunity to build relationships with physicians. Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, Mark N. Dominesey, MBA, RN, CCDS, CDIP, HIT Pro-CP, and Ann Barta, MSA, RHIA, reveal how coders and clinicians can educate each other to make the ICD-10 transition smoother.
ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes mellitus will look very different from the ICD-9-CM coding . Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer, explains what coders need to know to code diabetes in ICD-10-CM.
Coders who want to get a head start on coding in ICD-10-CM can now download the 2014 ICD-10-CM codes from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and CMS websites. The updated coding guidelines for ICD-10-CM are not available yet.
CMS is reexamining inpatient criteria because it has seen a significant increase in the number of patients spending more than 24 hours in observation. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, and Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, discuss CMS’ proposed changes and how they could affect outpatient observation services.
ICD-10 implementation is less than 16 months away, but a recent survey by TrustHCS and AHIMA reveals that 25% of responding healthcare organizations have not yet established an ICD-10 steering committee.
Outpatient providers are beginning to see more and more medical necessity audits, especially in the ED and for evaluation and management (E/M) levels. Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, AHIMA-Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer, and Joanne M. Becker, RHIT, CCS, CCSP, CPC, CPC-I, AHIMA approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, review the guidelines for ED E/M services and highlight common audit risk areas.
Q: My question pertains to CPT® vasectomy code 55250. This code includes "unilateral or bilateral (separate procedure) including postoperative semen examination(s).” The CPT manual states that a reference laboratory that performs the semen analysis may bill separately for this service. May we bill CPT code 89321 ( semen analysis; sperm presence and motility of sperm, if performed .) in addition to 55250 when the laboratory performs the semen analysis and the surgeon only performs the vasectomy?
Even experienced coders struggle to determine when to append modifiers -58, -78 and -79 because they are very similar in definition, but very different in scope and usage. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, reveals the nuances coders must understand to correctly use these modifiers.
Q: We get an NCCI edit when billing an intramuscular/subcutaneous injection (CPT® code 96372) during the same encounter as billing an injection, infusion, or hydration. Should we append modifier -59 (distinct procedural service)? Does it matter if an IV line is already in place before intramuscular/subcutaneous administration?
