Although ICD-10-CM resolves some problematic areas of coding, it isn't a panacea. Robert S. Gold, MD reviews how respiratory insufficiency will continue to challenge coders.
CDI specialists shouldn’t focus on reimbursement, yet the reality is that improved documentation often does lead to higher payments for the hospital. Darice Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, and Jon Elion, MD, offer tips on how CDI programs can mitigate ethical quandaries and demonstrate best practice.
Physicians often use different terms interchangeably when documenting sepsis. Robert Gold, MD , and Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, define the different terms and review when to query for additional clarification.
The best way to decrease denials or increase overturn rates begins with a compliant concurrent review of documentation. Marilyn S. Palmer, DO, and Jonathan G. Wiik, MSHA, MBA, review common Recovery Audit targets and provide tips for successfully appealing denials.
Hospitals are being incorrectly reimbursed for preadmission testing that occurs within the three days prior to admission, according to Recovery Audit findings.
Q: A patient presents with altered mental status/encephalopathy due to a urinary tract infection (UTI). The patient has a history of dementia. The final diagnosis is encephalopathy due to UTI. Should we code the encephalopathy as a secondary diagnosis because it’s an MCC and not always a symptom of a UTI?
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an abrupt decrease in kidney function that includes—but is not limited to—acute renal failure. Garry L. Huff, MD, CCS, CCDS , and Brandy Kline, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS , explain the clinical indicators of AKI and offers tips for composing queries.
ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS present different challenges, but both will require better documentation. Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, Donielle Bailey , and Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, discuss some of the areas where coders will need more information to code in ICD-10.
No one is perfect, including coders. Mistakes aren’t necessarily a reflection on one’s abilities or attention to detail. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, and Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, highlight some common problem areas and provide tips for compliance.
The 2014 IPPS Final Rule contains two significant changes that will impact coders: the 2-midnight inpatient presumption and the Part A to Part B rebilling. Marc Tucker, DO, FACOS, FAPWCA, MBA, and Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC, review the key provisions of these changes.
Health information exchange between hospitals and other providers has risen by 41% between 2008 and 2012, according to research published in Health Affairs from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC).
Unlike ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-PCS does not include unspecified codes. Thus, clinicians may see an increased number of queries on procedures post-implementation. Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, explains why facilities should review documentation for inpatient procedures now.
Q: A patient undergoes placement of a MediPort ® to receive chemotherapy for lung cancer. What principal diagnosis should we report? Should we report V58.81 (fitting and adjustment of vascular catheter) or 162.9 (malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung unspecified)?
Q: Our facility has a question about how other hospitals address this scenario: Patient is discharged to home (discharge status code 01). No documentation exists in the medical record to support post-acute care. Several months later, our Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) notifies us that the patient indeed went to post-acute care after discharge. The MAC retracts our entire payment. We need to resubmit the claim with the correct discharge status code. We are reluctant to do so because nothing in the medical record supports the post-acute care provided. Are other hospitals amending the record? If so, which department is adding the amended note?
Does the DRG accurately depict the patient’s story? Does the length of stay and severity of illness correlate with what actually happened? Heather Taillon, RHIA, and Cheryl Collins, BS, RN, offer tips to selecting the correct principal diagnosis.
Diagnostic conclusion statements don’t sufficiently capture the clinical context and medical necessity for inpatient admission. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, discusses the importance of clinical context and quality of clinical documentation in the medical record.
Q: Which ICD-10-CM external cause code should we report if a patient falls while on an escalator? This is the first time that the patient has been seen for such a fall.
Complete capture of procedure codes in ICD-9-CM helps to ensure accurate translation to ICD-10-PCS. Donna M. Smith and Patricia L. Belluomini, RHIA, reveal coding errors—including omission of procedure codes—that make the translation process more challenging.
The 2014 draft ICD-10-PCS guidelines include a code for the usage of a robotic-assist device in surgery, something coders can currently report in ICD-9-CM. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC , compares documentation requirements for coding robotic-assisted surgery in both ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-PCS.
At first glance, codes for insertion, removal, and revision of pacemakers look quite different in ICD-10-PCS. Kimberly J. Carr, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, and Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, compare and contrast pacemaker procedure coding in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-PCS.
For coders, the summer months can be some of the busiest, particularly for those working in areas that attract tourists. Linda Schwab Messmer, RHIT, CCS, and Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, COBGC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, review ICD-9-CM codes for common summer injuries and ailments.
Recovery Auditors audit the MS-DRG, principle diagnosis, any secondary diagnoses, and any procedures that affect—or could affect—DRGs. Christina Benjamin, MA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, reveals the most important documentation pitfalls and coding guidelines challenges related to MS-DRGs under auditor scrutiny.
CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology recently hosted a listening session to gather industry feedback and concerns about health information technology adoption. Read some of the highlights of the session and comments from providers in the field.
The recent ACDIS 2013 ICD-10 Preparation Survey found that 48 % of respondents don’t plan to add coding staff members to meet the challenge of ICD-10 implementation. Meanwhile, 66 % of respondents said they don’t plan to hire additional clinical documentation improvement (CDI) staff.
Healthcare data continues to become the industry’s newest hot commodity. Ralph Wuebker, MD, MBA, and Yvonne Focke, RN, BSN, MBA, explain what information facilities can extract from PEPPER reports.
The clinical documentation specialist role is relatively new, but can be a great place for coders. Lois Mazza, CPC, reveals why coders should consider taking on this role.
The demand for coding labor may increase as much as 20%–40% over the next two years, according to a recent report, The State of H.I.M.: A Study of the Impact of ICD-10, CDI, and CAC Initiatives Within the Health Information Management Community. Trust Healthcare Consulting Services, LLC, which published the report, surveyed more than 300 HIM professionals in all types of healthcare facilities in nearly every state. The majority of participants (84%) were HIM directors.
Facilities may be reluctant to charge for bedside services beyond the room rate because they fear double-dipping. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JC, CPC, and William L. Malm, ND, RN, CMAS, discuss what CMS does—and doesn’t—say about charging for ancillary services .
Q: Some of our providers see patients in our local nursing facilities. When these patients are admitted to our hospital, must we retain this documentation in our own records?
These days, the healthcare industry is all about the numbers, especially as pay-for-performance becomes more common. Lawrence L. Sanders, Jr., MD, MBA, and Simone R. Gravesande, RN, BSN , review how APR-DRGs work and why all coders should understand them.
E codes are important in a variety of settings. Pamela L. Owens, PhD, Kathy Vermoch, MPH, Leslie Prellwitz, MBA, CCS, CCS-P, and Suzanne Rogers, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, explain the importance of reporting E codes and why every facility should have an internal coding policy that includes E codes.
Q: What advice can you offer for sequencing pulmonary edema and congestive heart failure when both appear to meet the definition of principal diagnosis?
Hospitals continue to report dramatic increases in Recovery Auditor (RA) activity, according to the latest RAC Trac survey results released June 4. The survey found that the number of medical record requests for survey respondents has increased by 53% in comparison to the cumulative total reported in the third quarter of 2012.
The ideal approach to ICD-10-CM/PCS preparation is capitalizing on the synergistic partnership between clinical documentation improvement and coding professionals. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, discusses how organizations can use this dynamic to improve preparations for ICD-10.
Coders may be surprised by the expansion and reorganization of codes for diabetes in ICD-10-CM. Pamela Rand, RD, LDN, Bonnie S. Cassidy, MPA, RHIA, FAHIMA, FHIMSS, and Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, discuss the differences between coding diabetes in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.
CMS has uploaded the latest version of the ICD-10-PCS codes that coders will use for reporting inpatient procedures beginning October 1, 2014. The new files also include the 2014 ICD-10-PCS Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting .
In ICD-10-PCS, root operations precisely identify the purpose, intent, or objective of a procedure. Cynthia L. Stewart, CPC, CPC-H, CPMA, CPC-I, CCS-P, highlights the specific—and often subtle—differences in the definitions of ICD-10-PCS root operations.
Q: How will I report the initial insertion of a dual-chamber pacemaker device in ICD-10-PCS? The physician inserted two leads—one into the atrium and one into the ventricle–using a percutaneous approach into the patient’s chest.
Any ICD-10-CM/PCS to-do list wouldn’t be complete without the task of reviewing and revising query templates. Cheryl Robbins, RHIT, CCS, Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, and Sandra L. Macica, MS, RHIA, CCS, provide tips for updating queries for ICD-10.
CMS and auditors are increasing scrutiny of CCs and MCCs. William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, provides tips that coders can use to look for clinical evidence in the record before querying for these targeted conditions.
The accuracy and completeness of coded data can potentially affect physicians more as the healthcare industry becomes increasingly transparent to consumers. William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, Timothy Brundage, MD, Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, Cathy Testerman, CCS, EMT, and Donna Walker-Thomas, MBA, RHIA, CPC, CMA, review how coded data relates to physician profiling and offer tips for engaging physicians in documentation improvement.
CMS not only redefines inpatient status in the 2014 IPPS proposed rule, but it also discusses the ‘why’ and ‘how’ physicians should document the defining characteristic of all admissions: medical necessity. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, and Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP, explain how the proposals could impact inpatient admissions.
CMS has had a couple of busy months releasing various FY 2014 proposed rules. On May 1, CMS issued its proposed rule for skilled nursing facilities (SNF) . On May 2, the agency issued its proposed rule for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) . The two rules come in the wake of the IPPS proposed rule issued April 26.
The increasing complexity of the healthcare reimbursement system, quality initiatives, and the transition to ICD-10-CM/PCS put clinical documentation improvement programs in the spotlight . Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, discusses the importance of documentation improvement specialists.
Although coders and billers don’t play a role in determining whether condition code 44 is appropriate, they certainly ensure correct billing of the code. Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, and John Zelem, MD, FACS, review the requirements for condition code 44 and when coders should report it.
