With a widespread lack of awareness of national best practice guidelines for malnutrition, Joannie Crotts, RN, BSN, CPC , and Szilvia Kovacs, MS, RD, LDN , explain how identifying and diagnosing the condition is often still difficult, and how important changes can be made to improve a facility’s malnutrition program.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explains how under the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement, acute care hospitals in selected geographic areas assume quality and payment accountability for retrospectively calculated bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement episodes, and how this now requires a CDI evolution.
The AHA's Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS , Third Quarter 2015, opens with a discussion of the differences between excisional and non-excisional debridement-diagnoses with a long history of coding and clinical documentation confusion, explains Sharme Brodie, RN, CCDS.
Barbara A. Anderson, RN, MSM, says that in 2014, 66% of 318 hospitals surveyed by AHIMA had a CDI program in place. Anderson explains how CDI programs can be a valuable bridge between clinical care and coding at hospitals, and gives examples on how to improve upon a facility’s program.
A recent Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists poll says that 53% of respondents are not experiencing any real problems with ICD-10-CM/PCS, but coding experts have identified a few tricky diagnoses for coders to be aware of.
Allen Frady, RN, BSN, CCS, CCDS , and Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN , combat coders’ and clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists’ querying bad habits, and show how to support productivity and revenue flow for the facility.
For years, coding professionals have been tasked with ensuring that bills for Medicare patients include the proper elements of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) in order to try to accurately show a patient’s severity, but, as Robert S. Gold, MD , writes, there is much more to coding than DRG maximization.
Laurie L. Prescott, RN, MSN, CCDS, CDIP, looks at the definitions for primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses and how to determine them from provider documentation.
Denials are on the rise for certain diagnoses, procedures, and regulations. Sarah C. Mendiola, Esq., LPN, CPC, outlines steps providers can take to reduce denials by focusing on certain documentation details.
Even before ICD-10, unclear definitions for certain diagnoses and procedures led to confusion for coders trying to interpret physician documentation. Robert S. Gold, MD, writes about conditions in the new code set that could lead to potential risks for providers.
Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN, and Cheree A. Lueck, BSN, RN, discuss how the clinical documentation improvement department at their facility operates and their process for conducting a baseline audit and determining query rates across specialties.
Joel Moorhead, MD, PhD, CPC, writes about details for spinal conditions for coders to consider when choosing the most accurate ICD-10 codes for diagnoses and procedures.
Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN, and Cheree A. Lueck, BSN, RN, look at how to use audit and query rate information to improve documentation at a facility and how to encourage continuing education and collaboration going forward.
Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, reviews updates in Coding Clinic about coding orthopedic procedures in ICD-10-PCS, coma data in ICD-10-CM, and both cardiovascular procedures and diagnoses.
Marianne Durling, MHA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CPC, CIC, an HIM director for a health system in North Carolina, provides her wish list for her department and coders, including thoughts on implementing a CDI program, working with payers, and hiring staff.
Q: We recently had attending physicians send back queries with responses by the physician assistant (PA) or nurse practitioner (NP) who documented for them. Is it acceptable for a PA or NP to answer queries after the patient is discharged?
Linda Renee Brown, RN, MA, CCDS, CCS, CDIP, writes about the importance of tracking venous thromboembolism at hospitals and how to ensure physician documentation includes the correct level of detail to capture it.
Sherry Corsello, RHIT, CPC, writes about how to ensure consistency and reliability of records in ICD-10 and what providers can do with the more accurate data the code set will give them.
Coding, documentation, and diagnoses aren’t always clear-cut, which can challenge even experienced codes. Review the coding and documentation requirements for encephalopathy, stroke, and anemia.
A complication basically refers to an unexpected result, outcome, or event. Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP, and Trey La Charité, MD , detail when to report a complication and highlight the differences in complication coding between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM.
Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists must understand CMS pay-for-performance measures in order to improve data quality . Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCC, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, Steve Weichhand, and Sean Johnson explain how Patient Safety Indicator 90 is measured and what role CDI specialists play in capturing data for this measure.
Myths and misinformation about query practices still remain. Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, CDIP, and Nelly Leon-Chisen, RHIA, provide a refresher on how and when to query physicians.
Coders and clinical documentation improvement specialists often focus on different information when reviewing documentation for heart disease. Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP, highlight the different perspectives.
Accurately painting a picture of the patient's severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM) is essential for good patient care, and it is becoming increasingly important for quality measures and reimbursement. Sara Baine, MSN-Ed, CCDS, and Rhonda Peppers, RN, BS, CCDS , explain the importance of accurately reporting conditions that affect SOI and ROM.
Physician documentation drives quality measures, but physicians often don’t understand the link between the two. James Fee, MD, CCS, CCDS, Kristi Stanton, RHIT, CCS, CPC, CIRCC, and Jane Bonewell, RHIT, offer suggestions for ways to educate providers and improve documentation.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a manifestation of many different chronic disease processes, including diabetes, hypertension, and immune complex diseases. Garry L. Huff, MD, CCS, CCDS , and William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer, explain the clinical indicators of CKD as well as coding and documentation problem areas.
Both knee and shoulder replacement procedures include devices and fall under the ICD-10-PCS root operation Replacement (R). Mark Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP, CHTS-CP, and Nena Scott, MSEd, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P , review the definition of a device in ICD-10-PCS and review how to code for shoulder and knee replacements.
Coders can only use the documentation they have to code in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM. Adelaide La Rosa, RN, BSN, CCDS, and Deborah Lantz, RHIA, discuss the importance of good documentation when coding for fractures and congestive heart failure in both systems.
Pneumonia is an inflammatory process that affects the lung tissue. Robert S. Gold, MD , and Shelley C. Safian, PhD, MAOM/HSM, CCS-P, CPC-H, CHA, explain the clinical and documentation pieces of pneumonia coding.
Coders and clinicians seem to speak different languages. CDI specialists often serve as the translators between clinicians and coders, so it's important that all three groups work together. Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, Darice M. Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA , Jonathan Elion, MD, Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P , and William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP , offer tips for determining when to query.
Documentation and medical necessity continue to be scrutinized by payers and auditors. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CPCO, and Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, explain how complete, accurate documentation of the entire patient encounter justifies the physician’s decision to admit.
Clinical queries serve a definitive purpose when documentation in the medical record is ambiguous, inconsistent, lacking specificity, or contradictory. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI, explains why documentation improvement initiatives and heightened coder awareness of the need to query can be an asset or liability.
When an error occurs in coding, sometimes the coders miscodes a record, but in others, the documentation is deficient, leading to incorrect code assignment. Joy Strong, PMP, Donielle Bailey, RHIA, and Jill M. Young, CPC, CEDC, CIMC, discuss how good documentation and accurate coding go hand in hand.
CDI specialists shouldn’t focus on reimbursement, yet the reality is that improved documentation often does lead to higher payments for the hospital. Darice Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, and Jon Elion, MD, offer tips on how CDI programs can mitigate ethical quandaries and demonstrate best practice.
Physicians often use different terms interchangeably when documenting sepsis. Robert Gold, MD , and Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, define the different terms and review when to query for additional clarification.
ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS present different challenges, but both will require better documentation. Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, Donielle Bailey , and Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, discuss some of the areas where coders will need more information to code in ICD-10.
The best way to decrease denials or increase overturn rates begins with a compliant concurrent review of documentation. Marilyn S. Palmer, DO, and Jonathan G. Wiik, MSHA, MBA, review common Recovery Audit targets and provide tips for successfully appealing denials.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an abrupt decrease in kidney function that includes—but is not limited to—acute renal failure. Garry L. Huff, MD, CCS, CCDS , and Brandy Kline, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS , explain the clinical indicators of AKI and offers tips for composing queries.
Diagnostic conclusion statements don’t sufficiently capture the clinical context and medical necessity for inpatient admission. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, discusses the importance of clinical context and quality of clinical documentation in the medical record.
The 2014 draft ICD-10-PCS guidelines include a code for the usage of a robotic-assist device in surgery, something coders can currently report in ICD-9-CM. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC , compares documentation requirements for coding robotic-assisted surgery in both ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-PCS.
The clinical documentation specialist role is relatively new, but can be a great place for coders. Lois Mazza, CPC, reveals why coders should consider taking on this role.
The ideal approach to ICD-10-CM/PCS preparation is capitalizing on the synergistic partnership between clinical documentation improvement and coding professionals. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, discusses how organizations can use this dynamic to improve preparations for ICD-10.
CMS and auditors are increasing scrutiny of CCs and MCCs. William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP, provides tips that coders can use to look for clinical evidence in the record before querying for these targeted conditions.
The increasing complexity of the healthcare reimbursement system, quality initiatives, and the transition to ICD-10-CM/PCS put clinical documentation improvement programs in the spotlight . Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, discusses the importance of documentation improvement specialists.
Physician documentation must reflect severity of illness and risk of mortality for all patients. Robert S. Gold, MD, and Valerie Bica, BSN, RN, CPN, explain why pediatric patients require special attention in terms of clinical documentation improvement specialists.
Leading queries are frequently a topic of discussion among coding and clinical documentation improvement professionals. Glenn Krauss, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, PCS, FCS, C-CDIS, explains how to determine what constitutes a leading query and how to craft compliant queries.
ICD-10-CM/PCS incorporates laterality, acuity, anatomical specificity, and a slew of additional combination and complication codes. Who will submit queries when this information is missing in a medical record? Will coders or clinical documentation improvement specialists take on this role? Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDI-P, and Mary H. Stanfill, MBI, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, offer suggestions for determining who will submit queries.
The HIM profession is constantly changing, but HIM professionals are still responsible for maintaining the integrity of the health records. Lou Ann Wiedemann, MS, RHIA, FAHIMA, CPEHR, explains why HIM professionals can—and should—also play a role in clinical documentation improvement (CDI).
Do not view the proposed rule extending the ICD-10 implementation date from October 1, 2013, to October 1, 2014, as a year-long break from ICD-10 preparations. Rather, focus on using the additional time allotted to your advantage. This includes conducting documentation and coding assessments to gauge ICD-10 readiness. Gloryanne Bryant, BS, RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, explains why—and how—facilities should start assessing the readiness of their coding staff and documentation procedures in relation to ICD-10 requirements and create strategies to manage any deficiencies.
These days, documentation improvement and compliance are at the forefront of coders' minds. In some cases, coders are led completely astray by bad data and physician documentation that isn't entirely accurate. Robert S. Gold, MD, emphasizes that it’s important for coders to always look at the larger clinical picture in the medical record—not just a documented laboratory result or change in vital sign. Gold applies this philosophy and examines a number of conditions, including anemia, acute kidney injury, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction.
How does medical necessity get “overlooked” on the physician side as well as the inpatient side? Case managers, utilization review staff, physician advisors, CDI specialists, and coders, each carry out specific duties and responsibilities when reviewing medical records. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, C-CDIS, CCDS, examines contributing factors and takes a closer look at guidelines Trailblazer Health recently issued defining specific joint replacement (DRG 470) documentation that both hospitals and physicians should follow to support medical necessity.
Coders are constantly analyzing documentation for clues and details that may indicate the need for a physician query. For example, coders should watch for clinical evidence that points to a condition that the physician may not have explicitly documented. Coders also need to be wary of reporting conditions without accounting for context or other clinical indicators in the documentation. William E. Haik, MD, CDIP, explains how this can lead to inappropriate reporting of an MCC, for example, that the overall clinical picture does not support.
Even if you didn’t make a personal New Year's resolution, you should make a professional one: to be more conscientious when scrutinizing physician documentation. Experts say every coder should scrutinize physician documentation, especially with ICD-10-CM/PCS looming on the horizon. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, and Dinh Nguyen examine the role coders play in determining diagnosis quality and accuracy.
The task of assigning the appropriate present on admission (POA) indicator for various conditions is still fraught with a number of challenges—many of which stem from problems coders have in obtaining clear, explicit physician documentation. Colleen Stukenberg, MSN, RN, CCDS, CMSRN, and Donna D. Wilson, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, discuss how gleaning the necessary details from the records can be a daunting task in and of itself, and then inconsistencies among various physicians makes assigning POA indicators that much harder.