The July quarterly I/OCE update from CMS brought few new APCs or edit updates, but did deliver a new modifier. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, Jugna Shah, MPH , and Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H , explain how to use the modifier, as well as the impact of APC changes.
Q: A patient comes into the ED with sickle cell crisis and is in a lot of pain. The physician states the patient needed “aggressive” pain control for treatment, because what was given in the beginning provided only minimal relief. Could I code using CPT ® code 99285 (ED visit for evaluation and management of a patient, including a comprehensive history, comprehensive exam, and high complexity medical decision making)?
Q: We are coding for pain management procedures and have been doing dual coding in ICD-9-CM and CPT ®. With a medial branch block ablation at two levels for L3-L4 and L4-L5 for a bilateral injection, we are coding: ICD-9-CM procedure code 04.2 (destruction of cranial and peripheral nerves) CPT codes 64635 (destruction by neurolytic agent, paravertebral facet joint nerve[s], with imaging guidance [fluoroscopy or CT]; lumbar or sacral, single facet joint) and 64636 (destruction by neurolytic agent, paravertebral facet joint nerve[s], with imaging guidance [fluoroscopy or CT]; lumbar or sacral, each additional facet joint [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure]), each with modifier -50 (bilateral procedure) appended. What would be your recommendation for the ICD-10-PCS code? Currently we are coding 015B3ZZ (destruction, lumbar nerve, percutaneous) twice. We are not sure if we should be picking this code up twice or only once.
Documentation and billing for observation stays has come under increased scrutiny from the OIG, though many hospitals have struggled with changing regulations and frequently updated guidance.
Q: I work for general surgeons. Here is a common scenario: The surgeon is called in to see patient in the ED for trauma or consult. The patient is admitted, but our physician is not the admitting physician. I would tend to bill the ED code set, but do I have to use the subsequent hospital care codes instead?
Q: If the clinical impression is physical assault, vomiting, blunt injury to abdomen, and head injury with loss of consciousness, can I code the history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, headache, bipolar disorder, and depression?
On July 1, CMS will implement a variety of changes to current supervision requirements as recommended by the Hospital Outpatient Payment Panel. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO , reviews the panel's recommendations, and which CMS plans to accept or reject.
CMS made relatively few changes in the April quarterly I/OCE update, introducing four new APCs, deleting one, and reclassifying several skin substitute codes.
Hospital outpatient therapeutic services, such as ED or clinic visits, that are paid under the OPPS or to critical access hospitals (CAH) on a cost basis must be furnished "incident to" a physician's service to be covered.
The April quarterly I/OCE update brought relatively few changes, though CMS has continued to refine skin substitute reporting. Dave Fee, MBA, reviews the updated skin substitute categories, as well as updates to laboratory billing.
Q: I read that CPT ® code 20680 (removal of implant; deep, e.g., buried wire, pin, screw, metal band, nail, rod, or plate) is commonly used for deep hardware removal. What would be the proper code for removal on one screw that has already made its way out, is not under any muscle, and is easy to visualize?
Q: My office often has denials of evaluation and management (E/M) visits with our OB patients when using HCPCS modifier -GB (claim being resubmitted for payment because it is no longer covered under a global payment demonstration). Would coding with V22.2 (pregnant state, incidental) as a secondary diagnosis possibly alleviate this issue?
In January, I wrote about the perfect storm that led to the release of the 2014 OPPS final rule. We endured a later-than-usual release, errors in the data files and a release of updated files, a government shutdown, and a vastly shortened window between the release of the final rule and implementation on January 1. Judging by the confusion among providers?and corrections and clarifications coming from CMS on what seems like a weekly basis on a wide range of issues?we're still not in the clear.
Since January, providers have been struggling to reconcile conflicts between CMS' rules and regulations and those published by the CPT® Manual and other AMA publications.
Providers struggle to reconcile conflicts between recent CMS regulations and the CPT® Manual and other AMA publications. Jugna Shah, MPH , Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA , and Linda S. Dietz, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P , look at specific areas of confusion and how to code them accurately.
Q: I have been told to use the general surgery CPT ® codes in the 20000 series for reporting excisions of sebaceous cysts when the surgeon must cut into the subcutaneous layer. I don’t agree with this, since the 20000 codes do not give ICD-9-CM code 706.2 (sebaceous cyst) as a billable diagnosis code. Because a sebaceous, epidermal, or pilar cyst begins in the skin and may grow large enough to press into the subcutaneous layer, I think we should report an excision code from the 11400 series, and if need be, the 12000 codes for closure.
