CMS corrected edit 84, added five APCs, deleted two APCs, and changed the description of another as part of the April updates to the I/OCE. Dave Fee, MBA, reviews the most significant changes CMS implemented
Our experts answer questions about modifiers for diagnostic interventional procedures, Medicare recognition of CPT ® code 9066, reporting add-on code for psychotherapy with interactive complexity, reporting G0378 for all payers, and wound care coding.
Q: A physician's office collects a pap specimen and sends the specimen to the hospital lab for processing. The physician's office lists ICD-9-CM code V72.31 (general gynecological examination with or without Papanicolaou cervical smear) as the diagnosis for this service. What is the proper diagnosis code for the hospital to use for billing when only processing the specimen?
CMS is making a significant change to the Medically Unlikely Edits (MUE) by changing some of them from line-item edits to date-of-service edits, effective April 1. Jugna Shah, MPH, Kathy Dorale, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, John Settlemyer, MBA/MHA, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how the change could affect coding and reimbursement.
Q: We received an outpatient radiology report (exam performed 7/11/12) where the radiologist states: CLINICAL INDICATION: LUMBOSACRAL NEURITIS EXAM: LUM SPINE AP/LAT CLINICAL STATEMENT: LUMBOSACRAL NEURITIS COMPARISON: MAY 23, 2012 FINDINGS: There is posterior spinal fusion L-3-L-5 with solid posterolateral bridging bone graft. Pedicle screws and rods are stable in position. There are bilateral laminectomy defects at L3-L-4. The vertebral body and disc space heights are preserved. The spinal alignment is maintained without evidence of spondylolisthesis. No acute fracture is identified. No lytic or blastic lesions are seen. The sacroiliac joints are unremarkable. IMPRESSION: Stable postsurgical changes with solid posterolateral fusion graft. Would you use the following ICD-9 codes: V67.09, 724.4. or 724.4, V45.4? Our coders disagree.
With no national guidelines in place for facilities to use to determine evaluation and management (E/M) level, coders must apply their facility’s guidelines when coding an outpatient visit. Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CAC, CCS-P, CHC, and Joanne M. Becker, RHIT, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, use three ED case studies to highlight potential pitfalls for ED E/M leveling.
CMS is making a significant change to the Medically Unlikely Edits (MUE) by changing some of them from line-item edits to date-of-service (DOS) edits, effective April 1.
Our experts answer questions about, modifier -25, cardioversion performed during an ED code, denials for multiple port film line items, and procedure discontinued after administration of anesthesia.
Q: A patient received Toradol 30 mg IV and Zofran 4 mg IV at 14:38. He also had normal saline wide open with documented start of 14:30 and stop of 15:40. Is the hydration chargeable as 96361 (intravenous infusion, hydration; each additional hour) even though the initial service is not 90 minutes? Is the hydration a concurrent service?
In the coding world, it’s a never-ending clash that can cause compliance concerns—facility vs. professional. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC , and Peggy Blue, MPH, CPC, CCS-P, explain how coders in each setting use different codes for the exact same services based on the payment systems, the rules, and how each setting applies those rules.
CMS added 410 new codes and seven new therapy and patient condition modifiers to the Integrated Outpatient Code Editor (I/OCE) as part of the January 2013 update. Dave Fee, MBA, highlights the key changes to the I/OCE.
Q: In ICD-9-CM we only have one type of Excludes note. ICD-10-CM uses Excludes1 and Excludes2. What is the difference between the two types of Excludes notes and how do they relate to Excludes notes in ICD-9-CM?
The AMA added five new nuclear medicine codes to the radiology section of the 2013 CPT Manual , while revising and deleting a number of codes that represented outdated technology or were bundled into placement procedures.
When coders hear the words "interventional radiology," many think of vascular procedures. However, interventional radiology encompasses additional, nonvascular procedures, such as nephrostomy tube placement and drainage of abscesses.
Our coding experts answer your questions about physician supervision for chemotherapy, billing injectable drugs, Addendum B and coverage, new transitional care management codes, and stent placement with other procedures.
CMS defines self-administered drugs as drugs patients would normally take on their own. In general, Medicare will not pay for self-administered drugs during an outpatient encounter or for drugs considered integral to a procedure. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how to determine whether a drug is integral, self-administered, or both.
As more patients are being impacted by noncoverage of self-administered drugs, coders and billers need to know when and how to report drugs and drug administration services. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, discuss the differences in how drugs are paid under Medicare Part A and Part B.
Q: The rule our institution has followed with respect to HCPCS coded medications without a local coverage determination (LCD) is to limit prescribing to the FDA-approved indications. The question that arises is how closely do the physicians need to follow the package insert? For example, the drug basiliximab does not have an LCD and the FDA indication is: For acute kidney transplant rejection prophylaxis when used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen that includes cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Generally, physicians performing transplants at our institution do not use steroids or cyclosporine. They use tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or mycophenolate sodium. If the physician performs a transplant without cyclosporine or steroids, do we need to have the patient sign an advanced beneficiary notice?
Q: A patient went to the operating room under anesthesia for cataract extraction and repair of retinal detachment of the same eye. The surgeon successfully removed the cataract. The surgeon then accessed the back of the eye to begin to repair the detachment. After reviewing the condition of this eye area, the surgeon determined that the eye was in such bad shape it could not be saved, so the detachment was not repaired and surgery was ended. The patient was under anesthesia and the retinal detachment repair procedure was begun (although barely) but then cancelled. Should we report this procedure since the facility incurred expenses for the surgical attempt at repair?
