Last year, as ICD-10 implementation approached, organizations throughout the U.S. reported varying levels of comfort with regard to readiness and understanding of the impact of ICD-10 on physician workflow. For some, it was business as usual. For other physicians, ICD-10 became one more check box on the list of reasons to leave practice.
CMS proposed an extensive five-year, two-phase plan to overhaul Part B drug payments for physicians and hospitals in March outside of the normal OPPS rulemaking cycle that could be implemented as early as this fall.
CMS allows, and sometimes requires, providers to report certain modifiers in order to identify when a service has been provided by different types of therapists. Review the requirements for reporting modifiers –GN, -GO, -GP, and –KX.
Jugna Shah, MPH, looks at CMS’ new proposal to implement a new drug payment model for certain providers and how they can comment in order to the agency about its impact on their facilities.
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about terminology coders will encounter in documentation for Pap tests and other cervical cancer screening report
Pregnant patients with other health issues can lead to complicated coding scenarios. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about the clinical documentation necessary to identify certain complications and how coders can report these diagnoses. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
CMS has proposed a new drug payment model that could impact providers nationwide. Jugna Shah, MPH, reviews the multiple stages of the rule and how providers can comment to CMS about the proposed changes.
The new modifier -PO (services, procedures, and/or surgeries furnished at off-campus provider-based outpatient departments [PBD]) and the alternative payment provisions under the Bipartisan Budget Act Section 603 are both related to off-campus PBDs but define "off-campus PBD" slightly differently.
In February 2016, just four months after ICD-10 go-live, sister publication HIM Briefings (formerly Medical Records Briefing ) asked a range of healthcare professionals to weigh in on their productivity in ICD-9 versus ICD-10.
ICD-10 implementation represented an unprecedented challenge for the U.S. healthcare system. Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, writes about the impact of the change by looking at survey results that compare ICD-10 productivity benchmarks to ICD-9-CM.
Respondents to HCPro’s 2016 ICD-10 survey share their challenges and successes since implementation, while Monica Pappas, RHIA, and Darice M. Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, offer their thoughts on the impact of ICD-10.
Providers need to keep more in mind than just diagnosis and procedure coding when performing sterilizations for men and women. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, reviews the requirements for sterilizations and the part coders can play in avoiding denials.
Reporting modifier –PO (services, procedures, and/or surgeries furnished at off-campus provider-based outpatient departments) only recently became mandatory, but new rules and regulations could change the requirements in certain settings. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC, reviews recent legislation that could have an impact on modifier –PO and looks ahead to when CMS intends to offer more guidance.
Drug administration services follow a hierarchy for reporting, but coding can become complex when providers administer multiple drugs. Review these tips to help tackle tough injection and infusion scenarios.
The Zika virus has become a major concern over the last couple months and new information about treatment and symptoms seems to emerge daily. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about the latest information regarding the Zika virus and how coders can report it.
This month's column is all about data--the importance of providers reporting accurate and complete data, as well as CMS having complete, accurate, and consistent data to compute future payment rates.
The 2016 CPT® code update may have been relatively small compared to previous years, but the urinary and genital system sections did receive numerous changes to align them with other sections of the code book.
Remember, the hierarchy applies to all IV injection and infusion services. Chemotherapy services are primary and should be selected as initial when provided in conjunction with therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic services.
Specialty groups are often able to move faster on creating guidelines for new procedures and codes than other ruling bodies. But sometimes this guidance can create conflicts between physician and facility coders. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about how to avoid these scenarios and come to the best resolution for providers, payers, and patients.
Accurate coding and billing data is important for both providers and CMS. Jugna Shah, MPH, writes about challenges providers have faced with providing that data to CMS and what the agency can do to ease provider burden.
CPT codes for drug administration follow a hierarchy that is unique to those procedures. Review the hierarchy in order to understand how to apply codes for any type of scenario.
Post-traumatic stress disorder isn’t only reported for military personnel. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes about when PTSD may be reported and which diagnosis and procedures codes should be included.
The AMA introduced new CPT codes for 2016 to report intracranial therapeutic interventions. Stacie L. Buck, RHIA, CCS-P, CIRCC, RCC, reviews the changes and provides examples on how to use them in a variety of procedures.
Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and Peggy Blue, MPH, CPC, CEMC, CCS-P, explain when to report the new codes introduced in the 2016 CPT Manual for genitourinary procedures.
Perhaps recognizing the massive undertaking for coding and HIM departments in 2015 with the implementation of ICD-10, the latest CPT® update includes a relatively small 367 changes for 2016.
Some interesting tidbits of information can be gleaned from the most recent release of the AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS to help coders as they work in the new code set.
Per CPT, modifier -52 is used when a service or procedure is partially reduced or eliminated at the provider's discretion. Such a situation is identified by using the service's usual HCPCS/CPT code and adding modifier -52, signifying that the service is reduced.
CMS audits for meaningful use could mean collecting information across the coding and HIM departments. David Holtzman, JD, CIPP, and Darice Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, review what auditors could request and how to prepare your facility.
The government recently approved changes for physician payment systems. Is your clinical documentation improvement (CDI) team ready to tackle these challenges? More importantly, are your physicians ready?
Hospital coders can choose multiple modifiers to apply to a procedure code if the service was discontinued. Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, provides an overview of these codes and in which instances to use them.
Perhaps recognizing the massive undertaking for coding and HIM departments in 2015 with the implementation of ICD-10, the latest CPT® update includes a relatively small 367 changes for 2016. Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and Peggy Blue, MPH, CPC, CEMC, CCS-P, review updates to the digestive system and E/M codes.
Jennifer Avery, CCS, COC, CPC, CPC-I, writes about how the increased specificity in ICD-10-CM changes pregnancy coding and how to use gestational weeks in physician documentation to report trimesters.
Modifier -52 is used to report procedures that are partially reduced or eliminated at the provider’s discretion. Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, looks at how the modifier should be applied in hospitals and tips for compliance.
Providers will only have to report one data collection modifier related to a C-APC in 2016. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle MPA, examine the requirements behind the modifier and how APCs will also be restructured next year.
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, review new comprehensive APCs (C-APC) CMS added in the 2016 OPPS final rule as well as the negative payment update due to a CMS overestimation in 2014.
Before the new year begins, Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, CDIP, COBGC, recommends taking a look at post-implementation risks CMS and third-party payers have identified. She also offers solutions on auditing and reviewing these risks. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
CMS is introducing multiple new modifiers that providers may need to report beginning January 1, 2016. Jugna Shah, MPH, reviews the modifiers and the conditions for reporting them.
Nearly half a million patients receive dialysis services each year. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I, writes about the ICD-10-CM and CPT® codes providers will need to know in order to report these services accurately.
In addition to updating procedures for 2-midnight rule reviews, the 2016 OPPS final rule includes new guidance on coding and billing issues, including reporting certain CT scan services. Jugna Shah, MPH, examines the changes and what providers need to do before 2016.
Providers need to be careful when reporting multiple services with status indicator J1 on the same claim, as NCCI logic could result in no payment for any of the reported comprehensive APC (C-APC) services. Typically, when multiple J1 procedures or services appear on the same claim, the procedure with the highest rank according to CMS is assigned to the C-APC. Certain code combinations of J1 services will also lead to a complexity adjustment to a higher-paying C-APC.
Provider-based clinics and departments are increasingly common, but the rules for provider-based billing can often be confusing, especially given recent changes to modifiers and place of service codes.
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, review newpolicies and regulations from CMS in the 2016 OPPS final rule, including a new comprehensive APC for observation.
CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractors are aware of certain issues regarding National Coverage Determinations and Local Coverage Determinations related to ICD-10 and working to resolve them as soon as possible, according to CMS.
