Q: When coding excision of a breast mass with needle localization using stereotactic guidance, we report CPT ® code 19125 (excision of breast lesion identified by preoperative placement of radiological marker, open; single lesion) and new code 19283 (placement of breast localization devices, percutaneous; first lesion, including stereotactic guidance). The 3M system says Medicare NCCI edits consider this separate reporting of codes that are components of the comprehensive procedure if billed for services provided to the same beneficiary by the same physician on the same day. These codes will be rebundled by the Medicare payer and payment will be based on code 19125 only. Does that mean to only report 19125 for this kind of case? If there is an excision of a lesion by one surgeon and needle localization done by a radiologist, can we report 19125, with 19283 and modifier -59 (distinct procedural service)? We can’t find any official reference for this issue for 2014. How do we code excision of a breast mass with needle localization now?
Q: I am auditing a note for a fusion. The note lacks detail, therefore is hard to justify. The patient had a prior hardware placement. The note describes dissecting down, debridement of necrotic bone, and tissue work done. This is the entire note, after describing dissection, “Vigorous irrigation with 10 liters of saline and antibiotics was carried out. Hemostasis was maintained. The right S1 screw and rod portion was removed as it was notably loose. Additional decortication and onlay bone grafting was performed at L1-S1. Drains were placed…” They coded: 22612 (arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; lumbar) Add-on code 22614 (each additional vertebral segment) x4 22852 (removal of posterior segmental instrumentation) In the procedures performed area of the note, they state: Hardware removal, lumbar Revision fusion L1-S1 with onlay bone graft Irrigation and debridement of lumbar spine wound Since there is nothing in the note regarding autografting, I assume this is an allograft? Should this be coded? Also is that documentation enough to justify arthrodesis? Modifier -GC (this service has been performed in part by a resident under the direction of a teaching physician) was appended, although the language was not added for this. I can only assume a resident dictated this.
When an NCCI edit occurs on a claim, providers can go directly to CMS’ website and download the latest edits to pinpoint why the edit occurred and what codes may be conflicting.
CMS has been making it clear over the years that packaging would become a larger and larger part of OPPS, and in calendar year (CY) 2014 CMS made good on this.
Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CPCO, and Sarah L. Goodman, MBA, CHCAF, CPC-H, CCP, FCS, discuss the purpose of medically unlikely edits (MUEs) and how they are calculated by CMS.
Q: Can we report CPT ® code 32609 (thoracoscopy; with biopsy of pleura) with 32666 (thoracoscopy, surgical; with therapeutic wedge resection, initial unilateral)? We have researched thoroughly and were not able to find a clear answer.
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, examine the 2014 OPPS Final Rule and explain which services are now packaged, including drugs and biological that function as supplies when used in diagnostic or surgical procedures, clinical diagnostic lab tests, and device removal procedures.
Q: I have a question regarding CPT® code 22558 (arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace; lumbar). I perform this exposure as a vascular surgeon, with the orthopedic surgeon preforming the spinal surgery. If I perform an anterior exposure for a spine deformity using code 22808 (arthrodesis, anterior, for spinal deformity, with or without cast; two to three vertebral segments), do I bill 22558 for the exposure?
In addition to increased packaging and collapsing of E/M clinic visit level CPT ® codes in the 2014 OPPS -Final Rule, CMS made additional changes that will have an immediate impact on reimbursement or require operational changes for providers.
One of the most radical changes CMS proposed in this year’s OPPS was to collapse the five levels of E/M CPT ® codes and replace them with three new HCPCS G-codes, including one APC for all clinic visits, one for all Type A ED visits, and one for all Type B ED visits.
In the 2014 OPPS Final Rule, CMS offered the following -example for billing a laboratory test on the same date of service as the primary service, but ordered for a different purpose than the primary service by a practitioner different than the practitioner who ordered the primary service.
Q: I am looking for information about to how to bill for a transnasal-endoscope approach in removing a skull-base tumor. I have never been comfortable with the doctors wanting to use CPT ® 61600 (resection or excision of neoplastic, vascular or infectious lesion of base of anterior cranial fossa; extradural) to bill a non-invasive procedure. I am perplexed about which CPT code(s) to report for this type of procedure.
Skin and dermatology coding includes unique challenges with its extensive terminology and the need to calculate wound and lesion sizes. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC , discusses common documentation problems and how coders can improve their efficiency and proficiency.
CMS did not finalize a proposal to collapse all evaluation and management visits into three codes, but did change clinic visit level coding. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, review some of the major changes to E/M levels for 2014 and the new codes introduced. introduced.
Q: A patient presents with lower back pain and the physician documents findings of stenosis, degenerative “changes,” and mild facet arthropathy. Which diagnosis codes should we report? I would code 724.02 (stenosis, lumbar region, without neurogenic claudication) and 721.3 (lumbosacral spondylosis without myelopathy) for the facet degeneration. Another coder has stated that I cannot code 724.02, as the 721.3 diagnosis code will exclude the use of 724.02. Can you help with this scenario?
The number of patients using Medicare Advantage (MA) is rapidly growing, making Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) an increasingly important concept for revenue cycle staff to understand in order to guarantee reimbursement.
Our experts answer questions on port reassessment, laparoscopies, reporting multiple biopsies, rejected drug claims, post-reduction film, nipple revisions, and more.
Q: When we send in a claim for CPT ® code 29898 (arthroscopy, ankle, surgical; debridement, extensive) to Aetna with modifier –AS (non-physician assisting at surgery) for our physician’s assistant, Aetna will deny the claim saying “assistant not covered.” However, that procedure code says it is covered for an assistant surgeon. I have sent appeal after appeal and printouts from the American College of Surgeon’s (ACOS) Coding Today website showing this procedure code is payable to Aetna, and Aetna still denies the claim. Medicare pays on this claim, why wouldn’t Aetna?
Q: How does CPT ® define "final examination" for code 99238 (hospital discharge day management; 30 minutes or less)? Does the dictation have to include an actual detailed examination of the patient? We have been coding 99238 for discharges that include final diagnosis, history of present illness, and hospital course along with discharge labs, medicines, and home instructions. Very few contain an actual exam of the patient. Have we been miscoding all this time?
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, look at drug administration coding, beginning with documentation, in order to highlight the information coders need to ensure accuracy. They also review the hierarchy coders must follow when coding for injections and infusions.
During the January injections and infusions audio conference, Jugna Shah, MPH, president and founder of Nimitt Consulting in Washington, D.C., and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, associate director with Navigant Consulting in Seattle, reviewed these scenarios.
Healthcare providers are used to regularly changing guidelines and regulations that drastically alter their processes for coding and billing. Despite few guideline changes since 2008, drug administration still frequently causes confusion because of all the necessary factors to properly document, code, and bill the services.
Q: When a procedure is performed by laparoscopy, but only a code for the open approach is listed, do you use the unlisted procedure code? For example, the physician documented: laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. We used CPT ® code 43520-22 (pyloromyotomy, cutting of pyloric muscle, Fredet-Ramstedt type operation, with the increased procedural services modifier) but the coding department corrected with 43659 (unlisted laparoscopy procedure, stomach). We are a pediatric surgical practice. I feel because the procedures are very common and performed often, our revenue will drop by using unidentified procedure codes, but I want to code them correctly.
Q: We recently had a situation where a patient had come in to have his port re-assessed. He had been complaining of the port being difficult to access. Preliminary x-ray showed the port accessed, with great blood return. Patient has an allergy to IV contrast, so we just flushed the port, and did not give the contrast. The port remained accessed. How do we code this? Do we use 36598 (contrast injection[s] for radiologic evaluation of existing central venous access device, including fluoroscopy, image documentation and report) with a modifier -52 (reduced services)? The other option is a modifier -73 (discontinued outpatient procedure prior to anesthesia administration) or -74 (discontinued outpatient procedure after anesthesia administration). However we have no documentation regarding anesthesia, and I'm not sure the patient would even get anesthesia for a procedure such as this.
Coders select E/M levels based on criteria developed by their organization. CMS has proposed a significant change to E/M coding-replacing the current 20 E/M levels for new patients, existing patients, and ED visits with three G codes-but that change would only apply to Medicare patients and only to the facility side.
Our experts answer questions about followup visits in the ED, skin substitutes, flu vaccines, osteoporosis and fractures in ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-CM external cause code, modifier for discontinued cardioversion, and modifier -25
Q: The patient has had a previous bilateral mastectomy and is now coming in for a revision of bilateral areola with a dermal fat graft to the left nipple and excision of excessive skin and subcutaneous tissue from both breasts. This would be CPT ® code 19380 (revision of reconstructed breast) with modifier -50 (bilateral procedure) and 19350-50 (nipple/areola reconstruction) for both procedures. I cannot locate information that tells me if the nipple revision on the reconstructed breast is part of the 19380 or can be separately coded with 19350.
Packaging still causes confusion amongst healthcare providers and the number of packaged services will greatly expand if CMS finalizes certain parts of the 2014 OPPS proposed rule. Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, and Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC , discuss what changes could come in 2014 and how to avoid common packaging errors.
Some of the most sweeping changes in OPPS history were proposed in the 2014 rule, including new packaging rules, quality measures, and changes to evaluation and management. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Dave Fee, MBA, look at some of the changes and how they could impact providers.
Jeanne L. Plouffe, CPC, CGSC , and Jennifer Avery, CCS, CPC-H, CPC, CPC-I , review procedures performed on the gallbladder and how to determine the correct ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes.
Our experts answer questions about NCCI edits for injections, modifier -25, modifier -59, laminotomy with insertion of Coflex distraction device, billing mammogram for needle placement, and auditing electronic orders.
Despite its apparently straightforward definition in the CPT ® Manual , modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) can be deceptively difficult to append properly.
CMS added modifier -AO (provider declined alt payment method) and new HCPCS codes to the I/OCE as part of the October 2013 quarterly update found in Transmittal 2763.
Q: A patient comes into the ED with chest pain. An EKG (CPT® code 93005) is performed. The patient goes directly to the catheterization lab for catheterization (code 93454). Is a modifier appropriate for the EKG?
CMS’ proposed 2014 OPPS rule is set to introduce many changes, such as more packaged services, including lab tests and add-on codes. Jugna Shah, MPH; Dave Fee, MBA; Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC; and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, offer their insight on what effect these changes could have for providers.
Modifiers are sometimes essential to ensure proper payment, but choosing the correct one can be tricky. Sarah L. Goodman, MBA, CHCAF, CPC-H, CCP, FCS; Katherine Abel, CPC, CPMA, CEMC, CPC-I; and Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, discusssome confusing modifiers and how to use them accurately.
Q: We have a patient with documented age-related osteoporosis. She bent over to pick up a newspaper from a table and fractured a vertebrae. Should we code the fracture as pathologic or traumatic?
E/M coding and reimbursement for hospital outpatients could change dramatically if CMS finalizes its proposal to replace current E/M CPT ® codes with three G-codes.
Our experts answer questions about billing vasectomy and sperm analysis , coding for ED visit when the patient is admitted for surgery, billing glucose reading before a PET scan, documentation required for the functional limitation codes, and appropriate reporting of observation.
Q: The patient comes in for a cardioversion, but the international normalized ratio results were unsatisfactory. The physicians canceled the cardioversion. Would modifier -73 (discontinued outpatient/hospital ambulatory surgery center procedure prior to the administration of anesthesia) be appropriate?
Evaluation and management (E/M) coding and reimbursement for hospital outpatients could change dramatically if CMS finalizes its proposal to replace current E/M CPT ® codes with three G codes. Dave Fee, MBA, Peggy S. Blue, MPH, CCS-P, CPC, Jugna Shah, MPH, Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and Valerie A. Rinkle discuss the possible impact if CMS finalizes its proposal.
Medical necessity is as simple as it sounds and it isn’t important just for inpatients. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, reviews the importance of establishing medical necessity for outpatient services.
In January 2013, CMS introduced 42 therapy functional reporting G codes (nonpayable), but instituted a six-month trial period. That grace period ended July 1. Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H, Dave Fee, MBA, and Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, explain how to report these G codes and their related functional modifiers.
