CMS proposed an extensive five-year, two-phase plan to overhaul Part B drug payments for physicians and hospitals in March outside of the normal OPPS rulemaking cycle that could be implemented as early as this fall.
Few in the healthcare industry would argue that the way the government currently pays for drugs is the most cost-effective, efficient, and equitable method possible.
Last year, as ICD-10 implementation approached, organizations throughout the U.S. reported varying levels of comfort with regard to readiness and understanding of the impact of ICD-10 on physician workflow. For some, it was business as usual. For other physicians, ICD-10 became one more check box on the list of reasons to leave practice.
Jugna Shah, MPH, looks at CMS’ new proposal to implement a new drug payment model for certain providers and how they can comment in order to the agency about its impact on their facilities.
When the Quality Improvement Organizations (QIO) took over the role of education and enforcement for the 2-midnight rule on October 1, 2015, many anticipated that their reviews would only look at records from that date forward, but some hospitals have reported QIO record requests zeroing in on cases as far back as May 2015 and requesting charts for inpatient-only surgeries.
The new modifier -PO (services, procedures, and/or surgeries furnished at off-campus provider-based outpatient departments [PBD]) and the alternative payment provisions under the Bipartisan Budget Act Section 603 are both related to off-campus PBDs but define "off-campus PBD" slightly differently.
In February 2016, just four months after ICD-10 go-live, sister publication HIM Briefings (formerly Medical Records Briefing ) asked a range of healthcare professionals to weigh in on their productivity in ICD-9 versus ICD-10.
ICD-10 implementation represented an unprecedented challenge for the U.S. healthcare system. Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, writes about the impact of the change by looking at survey results that compare ICD-10 productivity benchmarks to ICD-9-CM.
Respondents to HCPro’s 2016 ICD-10 survey share their challenges and successes since implementation, while Monica Pappas, RHIA, and Darice M. Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, offer their thoughts on the impact of ICD-10.
This month's column is all about data--the importance of providers reporting accurate and complete data, as well as CMS having complete, accurate, and consistent data to compute future payment rates.
The AHA's Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2015, opens with a discussion of the differences between excisional and non-excisional debridement‑diagnoses with a long history of coding and clinical documentation confusion.
CMS administers the Medicare program and it is currently the single largest payer for healthcare in the United States. Medicare Part A, B, C, and D, all encompass a wide variety of services, all of which providers need to understand to determine which services are covered for patients.
For years, coding professionals have been tasked with ensuring that bills for Medicare patients include the proper elements of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) in order to try to accurately show a patient’s severity, but, as Robert S. Gold, MD , writes, there is much more to coding than DRG maximization.
Allen Frady, RN, BSN, CCS, CCDS , and Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN , combat coders’ and clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists’ querying bad habits, and show how to support productivity and revenue flow for the facility.
Specialty groups are often able to move faster on creating guidelines for new procedures and codes than other ruling bodies. But sometimes this guidance can create conflicts between physician and facility coders. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about how to avoid these scenarios and come to the best resolution for providers, payers, and patients.
Accurate coding and billing data is important for both providers and CMS. Jugna Shah, MPH, writes about challenges providers have faced with providing that data to CMS and what the agency can do to ease provider burden.
Beginning April 1, approximately 800 hospitals will be required to participate in CMS’ new joint replacement payment model. Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, outlines the requirements and what providers need to do in order to prepare.
The new ICD-10 system and its inherent errors, especially in ICD-10-PCS, has provided fertile ground for honest errors. But for this article, I'm going to talk about the other side of the coin, where new codes or descriptions of codes come out, often with inadequate definitions or directions, and people make up reasons to try to rook the system and bilk Medicare?that is, until enough caregivers get caught or advice comes out to squelch the "experts" who want to help you get denials by the hundreds or get hassled by Recovery Auditors.
Approximately 800 hospitals across the country that perform inpatient total hip and knee joint replacements will be required to participate in the latest value-based payment initiative launched by CMS, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, which becomes effective April 1.
To charge or not to charge--that is the question. Determining whether a hospital can charge for certain services and procedures provided at a patient's bedside is a task often fraught with confusion and uncertainty.
Denials are on the rise for certain diagnoses, procedures, and regulations. Sarah C. Mendiola, Esq., LPN, CPC, outlines steps providers can take to reduce denials by focusing on certain documentation details.
CMS audits for meaningful use could mean collecting information across the coding and HIM departments. David Holtzman, JD, CIPP, and Darice Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, review what auditors could request and how to prepare your facility.
The government recently approved changes for physician payment systems. Is your clinical documentation improvement (CDI) team ready to tackle these challenges? More importantly, are your physicians ready?
Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN, and Cheree A. Lueck, BSN, RN, look at how to use audit and query rate information to improve documentation at a facility and how to encourage continuing education and collaboration going forward.
Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN, and Cheree A. Lueck, BSN, RN, discuss how the clinical documentation improvement department at their facility operates and their process for conducting a baseline audit and determining query rates across specialties.
I first attended a lecture on the "upcoming" ICD-10 changes that were expected in 1991 (when the rest of the world started transitioning). On October 1, 2015, a mere 24 years and countless lectures later, the U.S. finally adopted ICD-10 (via ICD-10-CM and PCS, which are both unique to the U.S. at this time).
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, review new comprehensive APCs (C-APC) CMS added in the 2016 OPPS final rule as well as the negative payment update due to a CMS overestimation in 2014.
Providers will only have to report one data collection modifier related to a C-APC in 2016. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle MPA, examine the requirements behind the modifier and how APCs will also be restructured next year.
Before the new year begins, Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, CDIP, COBGC, recommends taking a look at post-implementation risks CMS and third-party payers have identified. She also offers solutions on auditing and reviewing these risks. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
Marianne Durling, MHA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CPC, CIC, an HIM director for a health system in North Carolina, provides her wish list for her department and coders, including thoughts on implementing a CDI program, working with payers, and hiring staff.
The holidays can be a stressful time for coding departments, especially this year with the implementation of ICD-10. Raemarie Jimenez, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CANPC, CRHC, and Darice Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, provide methods for HIM managers to keep coders engaged and productive this time of year and beyond.
After several delays, ICD-10 implementation is finally upon us. The healthcare industry has spent years planning, training, and testing?and now the moment we have all been waiting for has arrived. But don't breathe a sigh of relief just yet.
After years of delays, industry and legislative pushback, and millions spent on technology upgrades and education, ICD-10 is finally here. Even though the fundamental process of coding and billing claims has not changed, providers will still need to pay close attention to their processes to keep the revenue cycle going and reduce denials.
Joel Moorhead, MD, PhD, CPC, and Faye Kelly, RHIT, CCS, write about the importance of clinical anatomy to coding in ICD-10 and how to best use encoders along with the code set.
While focusing on documentation and coding, providers might not have considered the impact of MS-DRG shifts as a result ICD-10 implementation. Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, and Lori P. Jayne, RHIA, review how the new code set will affect several diagnoses.
Robert S. Gold, MD, discusses educational opportunities for sequencing viral gastroenteritis, coding past medical conditions, and reporting neonatal codes.
Medical record audits provide opportunities to educate coders, physicians, and/or clinical documentation improvement specialists. Robert S. Gold, MD, offers tidbits about volume overload and heart failure from recent reviews he’s done.
With Recovery Auditor audits on hold, hospitals may have experienced a decrease in the number of audits that must be addressed. Cathie Wilde, RHIA, CCS, and Kim Carr, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, explain why organizations still need to be able to justify code assignment.
It's great, identifying opportunities to teach. Whenever I do medical record audits, I always look for chances to educate coders, physicians, and/or CDI specialists about areas of misunderstanding by coding professionals or elements of patient experience that require specific documentation for proper code assignment.
Ask a physician why he or she documents in the medical record and you'll get a variety of answers. Some physicians will say they document because the medical records people hound them for the information, or they do it so they get paid. They may also say they do it to complete the medical record.
Many organizations still lag in ICD-10 implementation, but it's not too late to prepare. Gloryanne Bryant, BS, RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CCDS; Jean S. Clark, RHIA, CSHA; and Caroline Piselli, MBA, RN, FACHE, detail the steps organizations should take in order to be ready by October 1.
Taxonomy codes play a very important role in medical billing and credentialing for providers or group specialties.HIPAA-standard code sets specify a "standard" for transactions. In many cases, a taxonomy code is required to reimburse a claim; however, the reporting requirements for a taxonomy code may vary between insurance carriers and your third-party payers.
PSI 7 evaluates the hospital’s risk-adjusted rate of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections. Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, Steve Weichhand , and Sean Johnson explain inclusions, exclusions, and risk adjustment factors for this measure.
When providers use different definitions for the same disease, confusion and chaos result. Trey La Charité, MD , discusses how coding and clinical documentation improvement specialists can clear up the situation.
PSI 15 measures the hospital’s risk-adjusted rate of accidental punctures and lacerations. Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, Steve Weichhand , and Sean Johnson explain inclusions, exclusions, and risk adjustment factors for this measure.
Coders and clinical documentation specialists can use queries to improve physician documentation of a patient’s severity of illness and risk of mortality. Rhonda Peppers, RN, BS, CCDS, and Sara Baine, MSN-Ed, CCDS, walk through a case study to highlight query opportunities.
Our sister website JustCoding.com recently published its 2014 Coder Salary Survey. Since many of our readers responded to the survey, we would like to share some of the results with you.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) develops when the arteries that supply the blood to the heart muscles become hardened and narrowed due to a buildup of cholesterol and other materials, such as plaque, on their inner wall. It's also called atherosclerosis.
A hiatus from Recovery Auditor scrutiny may have allowed HIM professionals to focus on other issues, but Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, explores why HIM departments need to gear up for Recovery Auditors’ return.
ICD-10 implementation requires organizational coordination from a variety of departments. Chloe Phillips, MHA, RHIA, and Kayce Dover, MSHI, RHIA, discuss how organizations can overcome challenges regarding staffing, productivity, and data analytics as they prepare for the change.
We've compiled the numbers from the latest JustCoding Salary Survey and now you can see how you compare to the average coder in terms of salary, experience, and other factors. Monica Lenahan, CCS, and Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CHC, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-H , analyze the results and discuss the future of coder salary and responsibilities.
In the first part of a two-part series, Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, discusses the use of Z codes in ICD-10-CM.
With quarterly code updates and other regulatory changes from CMS throughout the year, the chargemaster coordinator has to constantly monitor the healthcare landscape, but the final few months of the year remain the most challenging.
Coders often talk about guidelines and coding conventions, but what about ethics? Robert S. Gold, MD , discusses the value of following ethical coding standards.
CMS designates a certain set of procedures as inpatient-only, meaning it will only reimburse facilities for these procedures when they are performed in the inpatient setting. Inpatient-only procedures present numerous problems for hospitals.
In part 2 of his series on medical necessity and coding, Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI, examines medical necessity and the 2-midnight rule using a case study.
The Official ICD-9-CM Guidelines for Coding and Reporting talk about the perinatal and newborn period as being the first 28 days of life. Robert S. Gold, MD, explains when neonatal really is—and isn’t—neonatal.
Coders now incorporate consideration of medical necessity when coding for inpatient admissions. Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI , explains the importance of understanding the concept of medical necessity as it relates to coding.
The complexity of coding rules and the quality of documentation in facilities sometimes make correct DRG assignment a daunting task. Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, highlights current DRGs that are subject to Recovery Auditor scrutiny and provides tips for accurate DRG assignment.
ICD-10-PCS will be a big change for inpatient coders. The best way to learn the new coding system is to practice, practice, practice. See how well you know ICD-10-PCS by assigning all applicable ICD-10-PCS codes for the following case.
CMS' introduction of the 2-midnight rule in the 2014 IPPS final rule makes properly identifying inpatient-only procedures even more important for hospitals.
The April 1 confirmation of the delay in implementing the ICD-10 code set until at least October 1, 2015, certainly took the wind out of many healthcare organizations' sails.
CMS' 2015 IPPS proposed rule, released April 30, focuses on quality measures, such as HAC reduction, readmissions reduction, and hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) programs.
Healthcare facilities are subjected to a myriad of auditorswho scrutinize everything from how many units of a drug were billed to whether or not a patient actually needed to be admitted to the hospital. Trey La Charité, MD , explains how to turn every denial into a learning experience.
Plenty of uncertainty surrounds the ICD-10 implementation delay, but healthcare organizations shouldn’t put the brakes on their plans. Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDIP , William E. Haik, MD, FCCP, CDIP , Monica Lenahan, CCS , Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, offer thoughts on how to keep moving forward with ICD-10.
In an ideal world, all coders and CDI specialists would get along well and work together with minimal conflict. No one is going to agree all of the time, nor should they. A healthy, respectful dialogue can lead to a better understanding of the patient's clinical condition and result in more accurately coded records.
You all know that I have been unhappy with some code definitions in ICD-9 and have ucceeded in getting some changes made in ICD-9 and ICD-10-CM code sets.
Inpatient coders will have a new coding system on October 1, but they won’t have to learn new MS-DRGs. They aren’t changing. However, coders will see some shift in MS-DRG assignment in ICD-10. Donna M. Smith, RHIA, and Lori P. Jayne, RHIA, reveal why the MS-DRG shifts will occur.
Whether you work in a dedicated children’s hospital or a general hospital with a pediatric service line, you will likely come into contact with coding charts of kids. Sometimes they are easy (e.g., an inguinal hernia repair without obstruction or gangrene is an inguinal hernia repair without obstruction or gangrene—except it has to be identified as right or left in ICD-10). Sometimes they are not so easy (e.g., complex congenital diseases and their manifestations and complications).
With the ICD-10-CM implementation date approaching, training and retaining staff that knows the new system is paramount for coding departments. Sabita Ramnarace, MS, RHIA, CCS, CHP , and Rudy Braccili, Jr., MBA, CPAM, review strategies that can help providers develop retention plans in their organization.
Drug-resistant bugs are becoming more common as antibiotic use increases. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CPC-H, CPC-I, CCS-P , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explains why and how microbes become antibiotic resistant and compares ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM coding for these infections.
Different studies using different methodologies all point to the same conclusion: Coder productivity will decrease after the switch to ICD-10. However, no one knows what will happen to coding accuracy.
In order to report accurate evaluation and management codes, coders need accurate, complete documentation. Coders can play a critical role in ensuring proper documentation. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, looks at methods coders can use to promote better documentation.
The audit landscape continues to change as Recovery Auditors expand prepayment reviews and CMS implements its new 2-midnight rule. Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CPCO, Ralph Wuebker, MD, MBA, and Kimberly Hoy Baker, JD, review some of the recent changes to audit focus areas.
Physicians are never going to like receiving queries from coders and CDI specialists. They really won't like all the queries they will receive after the transition to ICD-10.
The Cooperating Parties made the last regular update to the ICD-9-CM codes October 1, 2011, but they are still adding codes for new technologies each year. The updates are considerably smaller than the regular updates, but coders still need to be aware of them.
The ICD-10 implementation will result in a slowdown at every level of coding. Elaine O’Bleness, MBA, RHIA, CHP, Migdalia Hernandez, RHIT, Kimberly Carr, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, and Rachel Chebeleu, MBA, RHIA, provide suggestions on how to minimize that productivity decline.
How well could you code in ICD-10 using your current physician documentation? Do your physicians document the specificity and detail coders need to select the correct ICD-10-PCS code? Do your physicians document laterality, which coders will need for many ICD-10-CM codes?
