Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , writes about how the selection of the code and a principal diagnosis seems fairly straightforward, but there are multiple factors that must be considered and reviewed before a coder can assign a certain diagnosis as principal.

The world didn’t end on October 1, 2015. After years of postponement, the proverbial “deal with the devil” made between CMS and the AMA to push ahead with ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation was a year’s grace period during which physician practices could continue using unspecified codes without worrying about Medicare denials or auditor reviews.

Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each definition. This article takes a look at the root operations Inspection, Map, Dilation, and Bypass. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.

Now that we’ve had over a year to get comfortable with our ICD-10-PCS manuals, the 2017 updates to the guidelines and tables turned a lot of what we learned onto its ear. The update brought 3,827 changes to ICD-10-PCS, with the majority of the changes occurring in the heart and great vessels section of the manual. Redefined body part characters, as well as additions of new device characters, left inpatient coders wondering: What does this all mean and how am I supposed to code it?

Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , reviews changes that were made in the 2017 ICD-10-PCS Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting to arteries and stents. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.

Erica E. Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, writes about how using unspecified diagnoses in the inpatient world results in deflated quality metrics. Remer helps clinical documentation specialists remedy the situation and gives advices on how to aid providers in documenting to the level of specificity that is now needed.

Providers are still working to understand the impact of the February release of the controversial third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock. James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , tackles this new sepsis definition in part two of his two-part series.

As if coders and clinical documentation improvement specialists aren't under enough pressure as it is, the advent of the 2017 Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting brings to the table new documentation requirements for pressure ulcer coding. The guidelines can be viewed here: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/10cmguidelines_2017_final.pdf .

The new guideline for code assignment and clinical criteria in the 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting does not mean clinical documentation improvement is going away; instead it just upped the ante for continued improvement.

With all the hoopla over sepsis, pressure ulcers, and diabetes coding, there’s a little gem of coding advice that has been overlooked since ICD-10 was released: pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Adrienne Commeree, CPC, CPMA, CCS, CEMC, CPIP , writes about these changes and helps to decipher the new guideline changes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register for the free content if you do not have a paid subscription.

Trey La Charité, MD , writes about how he feels the days of merely maintaining compliance with published coding guidelines are gone, and suggests ways to protect a facility and appeal audits.

Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each definition, including the root operations that put in, put back, or move some or all of a body part.

In our computer-savvy tech world, the medical field has been notoriously slow to respond to newer technologies and applications of computer-assisted enhancements. However, in the HIM market, computer-assisted coding (CAC) has been touted to boost coding accuracy and productivity, in addition to being an important tool for the remote inpatient coder.

If your hospital resides in one of the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) required to participate in the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Model (CJR), you will also be required to participate in a new orthopedic payment model called SHFFT (surgical hip and femur fracture treatment) if an August 2 proposed rule is finalized.

Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CRC, CCDS, continues her review of the updated 2017 ICD-10-CM guidelines by explaining how changes to sections for laterality and non-provider documentation will impact coders and physicians. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.

Laurie L. Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP , writes that as many CDI teams work to expand their risk adjustment programs, a melding of two skill sets, that of CDI specialists and coding professionals, are required to succeed.

Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each root operation, including Restriction and Occlusion. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.

Q: The coders at my facility have started automatically linking congestive heart failure, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) to the combination code without any documentation of CHF “due to” hypertension. There is no documentation of hypertensive heart disease anywhere in the record, and the diagnoses are not linked anywhere in the record.

Sharme Brodie, RN, CCDS , discusses how to decipher between some potentially confusing—and possibly conflicting—information regarding diabetes documentation requirements.

CMS released the fiscal year (FY) 2017 IPPS final rule August 2, and ICD-10-CM/PCS code changes and the addition of the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) both had starring roles. CMS also made changes to several quality initiatives and reversed the agency's 0.2% payment reduction instituted along with the 2-midnight rule first implemented in the FY 2014 rule.

The fiscal year (FY) 2017 IPPS final rule was released August 2 and will be published in the Federal Register August 22. The majority of the finalized updates are consistent with those outlined in the proposed rule, but with a few refinements to applicable time periods. The final rule expands and refines the number of claims-based ­outcomes linked to payment under these programs. Let's review a few of the key changes to support your CDI program's strategic focus for the coming year.

Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP , writes about how computer-assisted coding software can be used to boost coding accuracy and productivity, in addition to being an important tool for the remote coder.

Robert Stein, MD, CCDS, and Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, co-author this article that provides insights into how clinical documentation and reported codes may impact payments and offer guidance on some common CDI challenges to strengthening data quality. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.

James Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP , offers his take on AHIMA’s recently published clinical validation practice brief. Given that AHIMA is one of the ICD-10 Cooperating Parties, their practice briefs must be read closely, and if agreeable, incorporated into one’s compliance plan. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.

The accurate capture of acute respiratory failure has been a long-standing challenge for CDI programs. The accurate reporting of this condition as a post-procedural event can be even more difficult.

We as coders, clinical documentation specialists, and compliance officers, are actively invested in coding compliance, aren't we? AHIMA and ACDIS emphasize coding compliance in their codes of ethics. If we aren't interested in coding compliance, why are we reading newsletters named Briefings in Coding Compliance Strategies and other similar publications?

Rhonda Buckholtz, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CENTC, CGSC, COBGC, CPEDC , and Brenda Edwards, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CEMC, CRC , tackled clinical coding concepts for chronic diseases at AAPC’s 2016 Healthcon conference.

Laurie L. Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP, provides coders with tips on coding heart failure, obstetrics, and linking language, and also offers the latest guidance given by AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS ® on these topics.

Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, address the inpatient side of bariatric surgery, and how obesity and body mass index play a role in coding.

If you've ever read an issue of HCPro's flagship newsletter HIM Briefings, if you've ever picked up an issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies and turned to the column "Clinically Speaking," if you've been a regular listener of HCPro's HIM or CDI audio conferences or webinars, if you're a member of the Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists (ACDIS) and subscribe to the "CDI Talk" newsgroup or listen to the ACDIS quarterly conference calls, chances are you've encountered the phenomenon known as Robert Gold, MD.

The fiscal year (FY) 2017 IPPS proposed rule alerted us to some significant changes to Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 90, one of which is a new name: the Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite. A fact sheet released by the measure's owner, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), provides insights into what may lie ahead if the proposed rule's content is finalized.

Allow me to introduce myself as the new columnist for the "Clinically Speaking" section of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies after the recent passing of Dr. Bob Gold. My hope is that this column will continue his legacy of helping you promote complete, precise, and clinically congruent ICD-10-CM/PCS code assignments resulting in defendable DRG assignment and applicable severity and risk adjustment. Thank you for this privilege of writing to you; I solicit your feedback and advice.

Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes about significant changes to PSI 90 in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule, one of which is a new name–The Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite.

Kimberly Cunningham, CPC, CIC, CCS , and other professionals comment on commonly seen MS-DRGs and inpatient conditions, including which terms coders need to look for in documentation to arrive at the most accurate MS-DRG and codes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.

Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS, Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS, Laurie Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, and Gloryanne Bryant, BS, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCDS, all comment on how over-querying is a common concern in clinical document improvement, and how over-querying can cause delays in documentation and coding processes.

The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule includes updates to payment rates and quality initiatives, but some of the most extensive changes pertain to proposals for certain MS-DRG classifications and relative weights.

On April 18, CMS issued its anticipated IPPS proposed rule for FY 2017. This year's proposed rule is very dense, including multiple coding fixes and updates, changes to payment provisions, quality updates, and even something for utilization review.

The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule addresses MS-DRG classifications and relative weights pertaining to the categories of other cardiothoracic procedures without MCC, and injuries, poisonings and toxic effects of drugs.

Robert S. Gold, MD, writes about important changes made in hypertension since ICD-9-CM, and helps coders better understand the relatively complex diagnosis.

With a widespread lack of awareness of national best practice guidelines for malnutrition, Joannie Crotts, RN, BSN, CPC , and Szilvia Kovacs, MS, RD, LDN , explain how identifying and diagnosing the condition is often still difficult, and how important changes can be made to improve a facility’s malnutrition program.

Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP and Laurie Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP discuss how for the past few years, healthcare professionals have focused on ICD-10 preparation, and while prep work paid off and the transition has been largely successful, facilities are experiencing a few bumps as their focus shifts from preparation to improvement of clinical documentation and coding.

Richard D. Pinson, MD, FACP, CCS , describes the Third International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock as published on February 23 in the Journal of the American Medical Association , and what the impact will be for both clinicians and coders.

When the Quality Improvement Organizations (QIO) took over the role of education and enforcement for the 2-midnight rule on October 1, 2015, many anticipated that their reviews would only look at records from that date forward, but some hospitals have reported QIO record requests zeroing in on cases as far back as May 2015 and requesting charts for inpatient-only surgeries.

Under the CJR, which began April 1, acute care hospitals in selected geographic areas assume quality and payment accountability for retrospectively calculated bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) episodes. Episodes begin with admission to an acute care hospital for an LEJR procedure that is paid under the IPPS through MS-DRGs 469 or 470 (Major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity with or without MCC, respectively) and end 90 days after the date of discharge from the hospital.

There have been some significant changes in documentation needs for diseases of the brain since October 2015. These can affect accurate patient data as well as providing information for the treatment needs of the patients both during a hospital stay and afterwards. They will enable patient information to be available to all providers and ensure that you get paid appropriately for the complexity of the patients under your care.

Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes about key details in documentation that coders will need to look for in order to report procedures using the root operation Dilation.

Cyndi Pickney, DO, FACP explains that as ICD-10 implementation approached last year, organizations reported varying levels of readiness and understanding of the impact on physician workflow, and now, there are unforeseen consequences.

Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , and AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes that reporting imaging, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy procedures will dramatically change depending upon whether the patient has been admitted into a hospital or is being cared for as an outpatient