CMS released the fiscal year 2017 IPPS final rule August 2. ICD-10-CM/PCS code changes and the addition of the Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice had a starring role in the final rule.
Deciphering documentation is frequently the most difficult aspect of coding. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about what documented information coders can use to assign codes—and what to do when that information is lacking.
Modifier -58 describes a staged or related procedure or service by the same provider during the postoperative period. For outpatient hospitals, the postoperative period is defined as the same service date.
CMS recently released a short guide aimed at teaching healthcare professionals how to use the Medicare National Correct Coding Initiative tools and the differences between types of edits.
Q: When our pharmacy mixes medications for infusion, they sometimes have to waste a part of the vial that was opened. They log this in the pharmacy log, which they keep in the department. We have been billing the full amount of the drug that was in the vial and have had no issues with getting paid. Our pharmacist came from a regional meeting and told us that this is going to change.
Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, review changes in the 2017 OPPS proposed rule for providers to comment on, including site-neutral payments and comprehensive APC updates.
CMS' Transmittal 3523, issued May 13, is the quarterly July 1 OPPS update. In this transmittal, CMS briefly mentions billing physical and occupational therapy and speech-language pathology services provided in support of or adjunctive to comprehensive APC (C-APC) services under revenue code 0940 (general therapeutic services) rather than the National Uniform Billing Committee--defined revenue codes for these services (i.e., 042x, 043x, and 044x, respectively).
"You are your own best teacher," or so the old adage goes. Sure, goodies and gifts are great for recognizing high-quality documentation, but for CDI teams struggling to obtain physician buy-in, the best strategy may be found in their providers' own records.
The accurate capture of acute respiratory failure has been a long-standing challenge for CDI programs. The accurate reporting of this condition as a post-procedural event can be even more difficult.
Healthcare organizations have become mass gatherers of data. But without sophisticated analytics, integrated IT tools, and processes to mine that data, they may not be able to take advantage of it.
Modifier -58 describes a staged or related procedure or service by the same provider during the postoperative period. For outpatient hospitals, the postoperative period is defined as the same service date.
We as coders, clinical documentation specialists, and compliance officers, are actively invested in coding compliance, aren't we? AHIMA and ACDIS emphasize coding compliance in their codes of ethics. If we aren't interested in coding compliance, why are we reading newsletters named Briefings in Coding Compliance Strategies and other similar publications?
CMS issued a final rule in June to revamp the way it pays for tests under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS), though the agency has pushed the start date back a year and worked to ease administrative burden based on public comments.
The American Hospital Association recently released its response to CMS’ FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule. The letter, which was sent to CMS’ acting administrator Andrew Slavitt, was presented on behalf of approximately 5,000 AHA member facilities and 43,000 individual members.
Laurie L. Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP, provides coders with tips on coding heart failure, obstetrics, and linking language, and also offers the latest guidance given by AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS ® on these topics.
Since the physician doesn't need to use a specific root operation term in documentation, coders should not rely solely on the term the physician uses. Coders need to know the definitions and the nuances of the root operations, especially those involving a device.
Q: Is it appropriate to assign ICD-10-CM code Y95 (nosocomial condition) based on the documentation of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)? It is appropriate to assign the code for documented healthcare-associated conditions. Should this still be queried for specificity, and should the hospital-acquired condition (i.e., pneumonia) be coded as bacterial, viral, or something else?
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about the types of treatment for infertility for both men and women, highlighting the associated diagnosis and procedure codes used to report them.
CMS’ 2017 OPPS and Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) proposed rules, released July 6 and 7, respectively, introduce policies that focus on improving payment accuracy across sites and for professionals in primary care, care management, and patient-centered services.
Providers must link the medical necessity of the treatment they give to the documented diagnoses or they may not get paid. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, looks at how to ensure medical necessity is proven for fertility services.
Q: Can a hospital that is not a critical access hospital (CAH) bill professional charges on UB-04 claims, Type of Bill (TOB) 013X? I have not read anywhere that hospitals cannot bill this way, but usually when discussing revenue 96X and other professional revenue codes there is mention of CAHs only.
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS, give coders ICD-10-PCS documentation and coding tips for three of the most common, and commonly misunderstood, procedures performed via bronchoscopy.
Q: When a patient presents with acute respiratory failure, as well as an overdose, is it ever appropriate to assign the acute respiratory failure as principal diagnosis, since it is an acute condition that would have occasioned the admission to the hospital?
Since the physician doesn't need to document a specific root operation, coders cannot rely solely on the terms the physician uses; thus it is important for each coder to fully understand each root operation, especially Control and Repair. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
CMS recently released the 2017 ICD-10-PCS code updates and guidelines, which include changes to certain root operations. Of the updates, the most notable modifications are the addition of root operation Perfusion, and edits to the current definitions of Control and Creation.
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, address the inpatient side of bariatric surgery, and how obesity and body mass index play a role in coding.
Choosing the correct E/M level can be difficult enough, but coders may also face scenarios where it’s necessary to append a modifier to the code. Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, reviews when to report modifiers -25 and -27 and instances when the modifiers would not be appropriate.
Comprehensive APCs (C-APC) have added another complication to coding and billing for outpatient services. Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, writes about recent changes that could impact the reporting of physical and occupational therapy and speech-language pathology services provided in support of or adjunctive to a C-APC.
Q: We operate a partial hospitalization program (PHP) and just heard from our billing office that there are new requirements for submitting claims. They want us to close out accounts weekly in order for them to bill them. We have done 30-day accounts prior to this and don’t see why they want to change things. Is there a certain timeframe required for billing these services? This is a huge inconvenience to make this work for the business office.
Choosing an E/M level code depends on three components—history, exam, and medical decision-making. History itself has four further components that coders will need to look for in physician documentation. Review what comprises these components to aid in choosing the correct levels.
Following are some ICD-10-PCS documentation and coding tips for three of the most common (and commonly misunderstood/miscoded) procedures performed via bronchoscopy.
If you've ever read an issue of HCPro's flagship newsletter HIM Briefings, if you've ever picked up an issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies and turned to the column "Clinically Speaking," if you've been a regular listener of HCPro's HIM or CDI audio conferences or webinars, if you're a member of the Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists (ACDIS) and subscribe to the "CDI Talk" newsgroup or listen to the ACDIS quarterly conference calls, chances are you've encountered the phenomenon known as Robert Gold, MD.
The last few weeks have brought us some direction, though, including the release of approximately 1,900 new ICD-10-CM codes for 2017. (The list can be found on CMS' website.) We also have a list of approximately 3,600 new ICD-10-PCS codes for 2017. (This is also available on CMS' site.) Of course, we will also be looking for changes in DRG mappings and the CC/MCC lists, which will likely appear later this summer.
The fiscal year (FY) 2017 IPPS proposed rule alerted us to some significant changes to Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 90, one of which is a new name: the Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite. A fact sheet released by the measure's owner, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), provides insights into what may lie ahead if the proposed rule's content is finalized.
Allow me to introduce myself as the new columnist for the "Clinically Speaking" section of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies after the recent passing of Dr. Bob Gold. My hope is that this column will continue his legacy of helping you promote complete, precise, and clinically congruent ICD-10-CM/PCS code assignments resulting in defendable DRG assignment and applicable severity and risk adjustment. Thank you for this privilege of writing to you; I solicit your feedback and advice.
Congressional legislation is often written in a way that obfuscates or, at the very least, makes it difficult to discern the impact or intent of a bill.
Anatomical modifiers qualify a HCPCS/CPT® code by defining where on the body the service was provided. These modifiers are especially helpful to indicate services that would normally be considered bundled but were actually performed on different body sites.
When compared to data from past surveys, HCPro's 2016 HIM director and manager salary survey revealed a harsh truth that many HIM professionals already know: There has been little movement in HIM manager and director salaries over the years.
In addition to laterality modifiers for right and left (-RT and –LT, respectively), coders can also report bilateral procedures with modifier -50. Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, analyzes the guidelines for these modifiers and offers tips on how and when to report them.
ICD-10-CM has brought codes to more specifically report obesity and related conditions. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, describes these codes and when to report them, while also taking a look at operative reports for bariatric surgeries.
Q: A patient has multiple labs on the same date of service. We receive the following NCCI edit: “Code 80048 is a column two code of 80053. These codes cannot be billed together in any circumstances.” Should we only bill code 80053?
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, looks at the different types of bariatric surgical procedures and documentation details providers may include for them. She also reviews which CPT codes can be used to report these procedures
CMS issued a final rule last week to revamp the way it pays for tests under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule, though the agency has pushed the start date back a year and worked to ease administrative burden based on public comments.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes about significant changes to PSI 90 in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule, one of which is a new name–The Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite.
Q: I am never sure of correct sequencing when the admission is for flu, pneumonia, and asthma. Can you suggest proper sequencing, and if queries are needed?
Michelle M. Wieczorek, RN, RHIT, CPHQ, discusses how documentation and coding can impact your facility’s data reported for hospital-acquired conditions and present on admission indicators.
Kimberly Cunningham, CPC, CIC, CCS , and other professionals comment on commonly seen MS-DRGs and inpatient conditions, including which terms coders need to look for in documentation to arrive at the most accurate MS-DRG and codes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Anatomical CPT modifiers aren’t used just to distinguish laterality. Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, reviews how to report modifiers –LC, -LD, -LM, -RC, and –RI for percutaneous coronary interventions.
CMS recently announced changes to require providers to report modifier -JW (drug amount discarded/not administered to any patient) when appropriate. Jugna Shah, MPH, looks at when providers will need to use the modifier and how to remain compliant.
The value modifier is having an increasing effect on physician payments and coding each patient’s severity is key to accuracy. Richard D. Pinson, MD, FACP, CCS, writes about how the value modifier impacts payment and conditions coders should be aware of that quality scores.
Providers should already be aware they will have to report more specific ICD-10-CM codes when CMS ends its grace period for physicians later this year, but the agency will also be excluding certain unspecified codes from reporting in 2017.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer discusses modifications and expansions to claims-based quality and cost outcome measures in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS, Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS, Laurie Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, and Gloryanne Bryant, BS, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCDS, all comment on how over-querying is a common concern in clinical document improvement, and how over-querying can cause delays in documentation and coding processes.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule includes updates to payment rates and quality initiatives, but some of the most extensive changes pertain to proposals for certain MS-DRG classifications and relative weights.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule released April 27 is replete with modifications and expansions to claims-based quality and cost outcome measures. Although many of these proposed changes are for future fiscal years, ICD-10 codes reported for current discharges will impact the future financial performance for our organizations.
On April 18, CMS issued its anticipated IPPS proposed rule for FY 2017. This year's proposed rule is very dense, including multiple coding fixes and updates, changes to payment provisions, quality updates, and even something for utilization review.
As healthcare providers increasingly accept financial risk associated with patient management due to the transition from fee-for-service to risk-/value-based reimbursement, the traditional model of healthcare reimbursement has been flipped upside down.
CMS' coding modifiers are not always used to report clinical components of a service. Sometimes they can be used in order to provide information about how a service relates to Medicare coverage policies.
The April 2016 I/OCE update brought a host of code and status indicator changes, as well as corrections to CMS' large January update that instituted policies and codes from the 2016 OPPS final rule.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule addresses MS-DRG classifications and relative weights pertaining to categories such as Excision of ileum, Bypass procedures of the veins, Removal and Replacement of knee joints, and pacemaker procedure code combinations.
Q: I have a patient with stage IV lung cancer that presented with fatigue, cough, and loss of appetite. Initially, they thought he had pulmonary nodular amyloidosis, but when they did an echocardiogram on day one they found a pericardial effusion. How would this be sequenced and coded?
Coders can choose from a variety of anatomic modifiers to report procedures performed on specific toes. Review how to properly apply these modifiers and which codes they cannot be reported with.
CMS recently released its seventh maintenance update for National Coverage Determinations to incorporate ICD-10 and other coding updates, which may require providers to contact Medicare Administrative Contractors regarding previously submitted claims.
CMS’ April I/OCE update includes numerous code and status indicator changes, as well as corrections to its January release. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC, looks at the changes providers should review to ensure claims including these codes are processed correctly.
Q: Are there any new HCPCS codes for recently released biosimilar products on the horizon? Our physicians and pharmacists are being contacted by the manufacturer about purchasing and using them, but we want to be sure we can report them appropriately.
Obesity is a condition that can complicate coding for other diagnoses in a patient’s record. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about how to report BMI and what must be documented in order to link it with other conditions.
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, reviews scenarios for initial, subsequent, and sequela encounters, and helps coders better understand how to assign seventh characters for each type of encounter. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, writes about the many changes in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule, and explains how almost everyone could be affected by CMS’ proposals.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule addresses MS-DRG classifications and relative weights pertaining to the categories of other cardiothoracic procedures without MCC, and injuries, poisonings and toxic effects of drugs.
The American Health Information Management Association has officially responded to proposed ICD-10-CM/PCS codes that were presented at the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting held in March by CMS.
Which services should clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists target in outpatient facilities? Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP , writes about how outpatient CDI differs from inpatient CDI and how it can be applied in hospitals or physician practices.
Modifier –GA isn’t the only modifier available to report how services may relate to Medicare coverage policies in hospitals. Learn more about how to properly report modifiers –GX, -GY, and -GZ.
CMS’ coding modifiers are not always used to report clinical components of a service. Sometimes they can be used in a hospital to provide information about how a service relates to Medicare coverage policies.
Sepsis isn’t the only clinical condition with an updated definition that could impact coding and documentation. A task force of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel recently changed terminology related to pressure ulcers that includes new terms that are not yet part of ICD-10-CM.
Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, discusses strategies for reporting, and better understanding, pyeloplasty in ICD-10-PCS. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Robert S. Gold, MD, writes about important changes made in hypertension since ICD-9-CM, and helps coders better understand the relatively complex diagnosis.
Q: We are currently using a hybrid medical record, so we have standard query forms with multiple-choice options that cannot be modified at this time. We wanted to include a statement so our query doesn’t seem leading. Is our approach to the multiple-choice query format appropriate?
With a widespread lack of awareness of national best practice guidelines for malnutrition, Joannie Crotts, RN, BSN, CPC , and Szilvia Kovacs, MS, RD, LDN , explain how identifying and diagnosing the condition is often still difficult, and how important changes can be made to improve a facility’s malnutrition program.
CMS issued the fiscal year 2017 IPPS proposed rule on April 18, and has proposed changes to the Medicare Code Editor software program based on numerous provider requests.
In February 2016, just four months after ICD-10 go-live, sister publication HIM Briefings (formerly Medical Records Briefing ) asked a range of healthcare professionals to weigh in on their productivity in ICD-9 versus ICD-10.
Clinical documentation and coding has a significant impact on value-based quality outcome performance. Such outcomes include risk-adjusted mortality, readmission, patient safety, complication rates, and cost efficiency measures.
ICD-10 has brought us I10 (essential [primary] hypertension). Some of us thought "That's a relief," while some of us thought "That's a travesty." I am one of the latter.
Last year, as ICD-10 implementation approached, organizations throughout the U.S. reported varying levels of comfort with regard to readiness and understanding of the impact of ICD-10 on physician workflow. For some, it was business as usual. For other physicians, ICD-10 became one more check box on the list of reasons to leave practice.
