What do cubism and coding have in common? Both can be viewed as art forms. Joel Moorhead, MD, PhD, CPC, details the three steps that the coding artist performs in reassembling medical record elements into abstracted form.
Diseases of the ear and mastoid process are moving up in the ICD-10-CM world. They’re getting their own chapter. In ICD-9-CM, eyes and ears shared a section. You’ll find diseases of the ear in...
We’re one step closer to knowing whether the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will actually delay ICD-10 implementation and if so, by how long. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)...
The dogs days of summer have arrived so the residents of Anytown descended on the dog park with their furry friends today. Sadly, not all of the puppies (and people) play well together and some of...
Observation services can generate so much confusion that CMS actually asked for comments on observation and inpatient status as part of the 2013 OPPS proposed rule. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, and Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, help coders unravel the complexities of observation services.
QUESTION: A patient complained of intractable pain from compression fracture (sustained the day prior to admission). The guidelines state if pain is not documented as acute or chronic, don't assign codes from the 338 category. Should we query the physician if the pain was acute or chronic rather than just using the fracture code if it appears that pain control was the main reason for the visit?
Inpatient facilities received mixed news on proposed changes to the list of complications and comorbidities (CC) and major CCs (MCC) in the fiscal year (FY) 2013 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) final rule , released August 1.
As part of the July update to the Intergrated Outpatient Code Editor, CMS reinstated HCPCS C1882 to the list of acceptable devices for CPT code 33249. Dave Fee, MBA, explains the implications of the change and reviews code changes included in the update.
Physicians can perform three different types of wound debridement and coders will find different codes for each type. Gloria Miller, CPC, CPMA, and John David Rosdeutscher, MD, discuss the different types of debridement, as well as coding and documentation requirements.
When a physician places a device that takes the place of all or some of a body part, assign a code from ICD-10-PCS root operation replacement (third character R). Think of a total knee replacement or...
Patience may be a virtue, but knowledge is power. Okay, enough clichés. The bottom line is we’re still waiting for a new ICD-10 implementation date. HHS published the proposed rule, moving...
There is nothing new about stress; humans have felt stress since the beginning of time, and coders are certainly no exception. Lois Mazza, CPC, discusses how coders can mitigate the many effects of stress while they handle the pressures of their jobs and lives.
CMS released its latest MLN Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter, volume 2, issue 4 in July. The newsletter addresses common billing and coding errors, with the latest issue addressing frequently cited Recovery Auditors and Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) findings.
In this month's issue, we unravel confusion surrounding use of modifier -59, explain the difference between NCCI and MUE coding edits, discuss building E/M ED visit level, review the updates to the I/OCE, and answer reader questions.
Learn about documentation and principal diagnoses, coders and EHR implementation, clarifying IBS and IBD for accurate code assignment, and ICD-10 fracture codes.
HCPCS code C1882 (cardioverter-defibrillator, other than single or dual chamber [implantable]) will once again meet the criteria to override the device-to-procedure edit for CPT® code 33249 (insertion or replacement of permanent pacing cardioverter-defibrillator system with transvenous lead[s], single or dual chamber).
Coders can run into two types of edits that may require them to append modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) to override: NCCI edits and medically unlikely edits (MUE).
The sheer number and detail of new fracture codes in ICD-10-CM is daunting, leaving many coders to wonder-and worry-about whether physicians will document the information they need to assign the correct codes.