CMS recently released its seventh maintenance update for National Coverage Determinations to incorporate ICD-10 and other coding updates, which may require providers to contact Medicare Administrative Contractors regarding previously submitted claims.
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, reviews scenarios for initial, subsequent, and sequela encounters, and helps coders better understand how to assign seventh characters for each type of encounter. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, writes about the many changes in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule, and explains how almost everyone could be affected by CMS’ proposals.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule addresses MS-DRG classifications and relative weights pertaining to the categories of other cardiothoracic procedures without MCC, and injuries, poisonings and toxic effects of drugs.
The American Health Information Management Association has officially responded to proposed ICD-10-CM/PCS codes that were presented at the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting held in March by CMS.
Which services should clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists target in outpatient facilities? Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP , writes about how outpatient CDI differs from inpatient CDI and how it can be applied in hospitals or physician practices.
Sepsis isn’t the only clinical condition with an updated definition that could impact coding and documentation. A task force of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel recently changed terminology related to pressure ulcers that includes new terms that are not yet part of ICD-10-CM.
Modifier –GA isn’t the only modifier available to report how services may relate to Medicare coverage policies in hospitals. Learn more about how to properly report modifiers –GX, -GY, and -GZ.
CMS’ coding modifiers are not always used to report clinical components of a service. Sometimes they can be used in a hospital to provide information about how a service relates to Medicare coverage policies.
Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, discusses strategies for reporting, and better understanding, pyeloplasty in ICD-10-PCS. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
CMS issued the fiscal year 2017 IPPS proposed rule on April 18, and has proposed changes to the Medicare Code Editor software program based on numerous provider requests.
With a widespread lack of awareness of national best practice guidelines for malnutrition, Joannie Crotts, RN, BSN, CPC , and Szilvia Kovacs, MS, RD, LDN , explain how identifying and diagnosing the condition is often still difficult, and how important changes can be made to improve a facility’s malnutrition program.
Q: We are currently using a hybrid medical record, so we have standard query forms with multiple-choice options that cannot be modified at this time. We wanted to include a statement so our query doesn’t seem leading. Is our approach to the multiple-choice query format appropriate?
Robert S. Gold, MD, writes about important changes made in hypertension since ICD-9-CM, and helps coders better understand the relatively complex diagnosis.
Clinical documentation and coding has a significant impact on value-based quality outcome performance. Such outcomes include risk-adjusted mortality, readmission, patient safety, complication rates, and cost efficiency measures.
ICD-10 has brought us I10 (essential [primary] hypertension). Some of us thought "That's a relief," while some of us thought "That's a travesty." I am one of the latter.
In February 2016, just four months after ICD-10 go-live, sister publication HIM Briefings (formerly Medical Records Briefing ) asked a range of healthcare professionals to weigh in on their productivity in ICD-9 versus ICD-10.
Few in the healthcare industry would argue that the way the government currently pays for drugs is the most cost-effective, efficient, and equitable method possible.
Last year, as ICD-10 implementation approached, organizations throughout the U.S. reported varying levels of comfort with regard to readiness and understanding of the impact of ICD-10 on physician workflow. For some, it was business as usual. For other physicians, ICD-10 became one more check box on the list of reasons to leave practice.
CMS proposed an extensive five-year, two-phase plan to overhaul Part B drug payments for physicians and hospitals in March outside of the normal OPPS rulemaking cycle that could be implemented as early as this fall.
CMS released a list of the thousands of new ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS codes set to be activated October 1, 2016, as part of the 2017 IPPS proposed rule.
Jugna Shah, MPH, looks at CMS’ new proposal to implement a new drug payment model for certain providers and how they can comment in order to the agency about its impact on their facilities.
CMS allows, and sometimes requires, providers to report certain modifiers in order to identify when a service has been provided by different types of therapists. Review the requirements for reporting modifiers –GN, -GO, -GP, and –KX.
Q: Our providers are reluctant to document a correlation between symptoms and a true diagnosis. Do you have any good ways to get them to do this? For example, our providers document "diabetes" but they often don't include additional details that should be there (e.g., gestational diabetes or type II diabetes mellitus in pregnancy).
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about terminology coders will encounter in documentation for Pap tests and other cervical cancer screening report
Robert S. Gold, MD, writes about the significant changes in documentation needs for diseases of the brain and how this can affect patient data, as well as the treatment needs of the patients both during a hospital stay and afterward.
Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP and Laurie Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP discuss how for the past few years, healthcare professionals have focused on ICD-10 preparation, and while prep work paid off and the transition has been largely successful, facilities are experiencing a few bumps as their focus shifts from preparation to improvement of clinical documentation and coding.
Q: We have a teenager with systemic lupus erythematosus and history of lupus nephritis who came into the ED with seizures. The physician admitted the patient with documentation of with status epilepticus and hypertensive urgency. The intensivists then documented hypertensive encephalopathy. What should we choose as the principal diagnosis?
ICD-10-PCS defines the root operations in very specific ways and coders need to know the definitions and the nuances of the root operations. Learn more about root operations that involve the physician looking at a patient, Inspection and Map.
CMS issued the fiscal year 2017 IPPS proposed rule yesterday with updates to several quality initiatives and a reversal of the agency’s 0.2% payment reduction instituted along with the 2-midnight rule in the FY 2014 rule.
Pregnant patients with other health issues can lead to complicated coding scenarios. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about the clinical documentation necessary to identify certain complications and how coders can report these diagnoses. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register here if you do not have a paid subscription. Once you have set up your free registration, you can log in and access this article by clicking here.
Q: Can CPT® code 76700 (ultrasound, abdominal, real time with image documentation; complete) be coded with 76770 (ultrasound, retroperitoneal [e.g., renal, aorta, nodes], real time with image documentation; limited) on the same date of service during the same session?
E/M services resulted in a projected $4.5 billion in improper Medicare payments in 2014, according to the April 2016 Medicare Quarterly Compliance Newsletter, accounting for 9.3% of the overall Medicare fee-for-service improper payment rate.
CMS has proposed a new drug payment model that could impact providers nationwide. Jugna Shah, MPH, reviews the multiple stages of the rule and how providers can comment to CMS about the proposed changes.
Richard D. Pinson, MD, FACP, CCS , describes the Third International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock as published on February 23 in the Journal of the American Medical Association , and what the impact will be for both clinicians and coders.
An infographic newly released by CMS guides healthcare providers toward better assessing, addressing, and maintaining progress since ICD-10 implementation. Identifying key performance indicators and creating baselines for KPI analysis are important steps in tracking progress, says CMS.
When the Quality Improvement Organizations (QIO) took over the role of education and enforcement for the 2-midnight rule on October 1, 2015, many anticipated that their reviews would only look at records from that date forward, but some hospitals have reported QIO record requests zeroing in on cases as far back as May 2015 and requesting charts for inpatient-only surgeries.
Q: We are having trouble determining how to assign a code for a pressure ulcer that begins as a Stage I concern that is present on admission (POA) but advances during the patient’s stay to a Stage II or a Stage III. Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2008, p. 194, tells us that even if the ulcer advances it would still be coded as POA, but would even an advanced stage still be considered POA?
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explains how under the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement, acute care hospitals in selected geographic areas assume quality and payment accountability for retrospectively calculated bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement episodes, and how this now requires a CDI evolution.
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)¹ as published on February 23 in the Journal of the American Medical Association represents a radical departure from the prior sepsis definitions in 1991² (identified as Sepsis-1) and 2001³ (identified as Sepsis-2) and subsequent Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines through 2015.
Under the CJR, which began April 1, acute care hospitals in selected geographic areas assume quality and payment accountability for retrospectively calculated bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) episodes. Episodes begin with admission to an acute care hospital for an LEJR procedure that is paid under the IPPS through MS-DRGs 469 or 470 (Major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity with or without MCC, respectively) and end 90 days after the date of discharge from the hospital.
There have been some significant changes in documentation needs for diseases of the brain since October 2015. These can affect accurate patient data as well as providing information for the treatment needs of the patients both during a hospital stay and afterwards. They will enable patient information to be available to all providers and ensure that you get paid appropriately for the complexity of the patients under your care.
