Sometimes people do their homework with setting up a new system, and sometimes they don't. Sometimes they do their homework, but not enough of it, and billions of dollars of wasteful spending occurs that could be avoided. But "they" won't listen.
A 12-year-old male developed umbilical discomfort Monday and didn't eat much dinner. On Tuesday, he started vomiting at school and the pain shifted to his right lower quadrant. His parents brought him to the ED, where his vital signs showed:
Because CMS has not created any national ED E/M guidelines, providers must create their own criteria for each visit level. CMS has developed a list of 11 criteria that it uses when auditing facility E/M criteria.
Dual coding. Reformatting queries. Educating physicians. Let's face it?the to-do list for ICD-10 preparation is pretty long, and can be a bit daunting. With ICD-10 implementation happening this month, there's one thing your facility should do: prioritize.
Providers have to create their own ED E/M guidelines, which can present a variety of challenges for facilities. For coders, this means an understanding of how to calculate critical care and other factors in order to report the correct visit level.
Ready or not, ICD-10 is here. Sam Antonios, MD, FACP, FHM, CCDS, writes about how to talk to physicians about the transition in order to make it as seamless as possible.
Most improper payments for diagnostic nasal endoscopies reviewed during a Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) special study occurred due to insufficient documentation, according to the latest Medicare Quarterly Compliance Newsletter .
Coders can no longer rely on the muscle memory and cheat sheets they developed working with ICD-9-CM for so long. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, CDIP, COBGC, reviews ways coders can update their processes for reporting certain OB/GYN services in ICD-10-CM.
Coders will need to master root operations in order to be successful in ICD-10-PCS. Cindy Basham, MHA, MSCCS, BSN, CCS, CPC, writes about which root operations will be most frequently used for cardiovascular procedures and how to interpret the guidelines related to them.
Providers need to report all services from October 1 forward with ICD-10 codes, but many will likely face scenarios with patients whose dates of service begin prior to October 1 and end after implementation. CMS has released special guidance to clarify how those instances would be billed with each bill type in MLN Matters ® SE1325 .
Queries will no doubt increase due to the increased specificity in ICD-10-PCS. John C. Alexander Jr., MD, MBA, James Fee, MD, CCS, CCDS, and George W. Wood II, MD, offer insight into which specialties will be most impacted and how coders can talk to surgeons about the query process.
Q: How can our team prepare for potential productivity losses post-ICD-10 implementation, specifically regarding procedure codes? Should we consider hiring additional staff or staff with a surgical background?
The updated guidelines in ICD-10-CM will impact how coders report certain diagnoses. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I, highlights important changes in each section for coders to review before implementation.
Sue Bowman, MJ, RHIA, CCS, FAHIMA, and Rhonda Buckholtz, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CENTC, CGSC, COBGC, CPEDC, provide strategies for coders and coding department managers to speak with physicians regarding ICD-10 in order to allay physicians’ fears.
Q: I have been told by our billers that infusion codes reported in the ED along with an E/M code that has modifier -25 (significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service on the same day of the procedure or other service) require another modifier. I thought that -25 is the only modifier that should be submitted, unless the provider started a second infusion at a second site on the body. This is the first time I’ve been told the infusion coder need a modifier if the E/M has modifier -25 appended. All of my educational articles tell me that the two can be reported together. Have I missed an update somewhere along the way?
A Recovery Auditor review of claims from September 25, 2012, to August 30, 2013, found providers billing hydration therapy with diagnosis codes not considered reasonable and medically necessary, according to the July 2015 Medicare Quarterly Compliance Newsletter .
Combination codes in ICD-10-CM will allow coders to report pressure ulcer location and severity in a single code. Jaci Johnson Kipreos, CPC, CPMA, CEMC, COC, CPC-I, and Betty Hovey, CPC, CPC-H, CPB, CPMA, CPC-I, CPCD, review the stages of pressure ulcers and which information coders will have to look for in documentation.
ICD-10-CM seventh characters can be used to report more than just the episode of care. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explains different seventh character uses and when to report them.
Six ICD-10-PCS root operations require a device, including Revision, Replacement, and Removal. Gretchen Young-Charles, RHIA, and Anita Rapier, RHIT, CCS, review how to differentiate these root operations and report associated devices.
Q: In my facility, we are supposed to send an email to our physician advisor (PA) and to administration if a query is not answered within a week. However, this policy doesn’t work well because administration does not do anything with that information, and the PA doesn’t have time to review unanswered queries. Do you have any suggestions concerning when to let a query go unanswered?
CMS has released a transcript and recording of its August 27 MLN Connects Call featuring ICD-10 coding guidance and the results of CMS’ final round of end-to-end testing.
The 2016 IPPS final rule continues CMS’ plan to shift Medicare payments from volume to quality. Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS, and James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, CDIP, analyze the rule and the impact it could have on providers.
ICD-10 implementation will arrive very soon, and many facilities are putting the final touches on their preparations. In the rush to complete coding education, documentation improvement, and system updates, HIM managers may not have looked at looming MS-DRG shifts.
Robert S. Gold, MD, discusses educational opportunities for sequencing viral gastroenteritis, coding past medical conditions, and reporting neonatal codes.
In this month's issue, we review the quality and coding changes finalized in the 2016 IPPS final rule and explain how to identify MS-DRG shifts in ICD-10-PCS. Robert S. Gold discusses sequencing viral gastroenteritis, coding past medical conditions, and reporting neonatal codes
OPPS costs rose approximately $1 billion more than expected in 2014 due to a CMS overestimation of the impact of laboratory packaging changes, according to the 2016 OPPS proposed rule. As a result, CMS proposes a 2% reduction to the 2016 conversion factor. CMS also proposes to expand laboratory packaging from date of service to the claim level.
The 2016 OPPS proposed rule released July 2 is deceptively short, but packs a punch. CMS is proposing the most massive APC reconfiguration and consolidation of APC groups since the beginning of OPPS, says Jugna Shah, MPH, president and founder of Nimitt Consulting, based in Washington, D.C., and Spicer, Minnesota.
In ICD-10-CM, to tell the patient’s whole story, coders need to report external cause codes. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, explains the benefits of these codes and how to report them.
ICD-10-PCS will completely change the way coders report inpatient procedures. Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, and Lynn Kuehn, MS, RHIA, CCS-P, FAHIMA, reveal potential trouble spots for the new coding system.
The only difference between ICD-10-PCS root operations Excision and Resection is the amount of the body part removed. Jennifer Avery, CCS, COC, CPC, CPC-I, Anita Rapier, RHIT, CCS, and Cheree Lueck, BSN, RN, provide tips for determining the correct root operation.
Every once in a while, another facility will send us a case to review and help them code. Here at the Fix ‘Em Up Clinic, we are happy to share our knowledge as we prepare for October 1. In that...
CMS is proposing a new status indicator to be assigned to laboratory tests so when the tests are the only service on a claim, CMS will pay for them separately under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule without providers having to do anything additional from a reporting perspective.
Q: I have a question regarding facility coding for evaluation and management (E/M) levels, not for an ED physician, but for facility-level nursing in the ED. If a specialist is called to evaluate or consult on a patient, the nursing intervention is what the facility-level criteria is based on. For example, a patient has difficulty walking, a nurse assists the patient to get an x-ray, takes vitals, does an initial assessment, then provides discharge instructions of moderate complexity. I would code this scenario as a level 3.
The expanded code set available in ICD-10-CM will give providers the chance to better tell the story of each patient’s care. Glenn Krauss , RHIA, BBA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, CCDS, C-CDI, PCS, FCS, C-CDAM, explains how coders can assist physicians in telling that story .
ICD-10 implementation is almost here, but coders are still facing resistance from physicians. W. Jeff Terry, MD, highlights ICD-10 challenges from the physician perspective, while Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, responds from a coder’s point of view.
The 2016 OPPS proposed rule introduces APC restructuring, new comprehensive APCs, and many other potential changes for next year. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CPCO, CCDS, review the proposals and what they could mean for providers.
We’re 43 (calendar) days from ICD-10 implementation. We’ve only got 31 working days until October 1. If you are all set for ICD-10, you’re probably fine tuning your coding and documentation, maybe...
Kids will soon be heading back to school here in Anytown, which also means the sports teams are holding preseason camps. And some of our local players practice a little too hard. Take Shaun, for...
Drainage procedures can be therapeutic in nature or diagnostic, such as when a physician removes a fluid or gas for biopsy. A nita Rapier, RHIT, CCS, Nelly Leon-Chisen, RHIA, and Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS , highlight the differences in coding diagnostic and therapeutic thoracocentesis and lumbar tap procedures in ICD-10-PCS.
Medical record audits provide opportunities to educate coders, physicians, and/or clinical documentation improvement specialists. Robert S. Gold, MD, offers tidbits about volume overload and heart failure from recent reviews he’s done.
With Recovery Auditor audits on hold, hospitals may have experienced a decrease in the number of audits that must be addressed. Cathie Wilde, RHIA, CCS, and Kim Carr, RHIT, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, explain why organizations still need to be able to justify code assignment.
Q: If the physician documents “concerning for,” “considering,” “cannot be ruled out,” or “cannot be excluded” for a diagnosis, is that considered an uncertain diagnosis? Can those terms be coded if the patient is being worked up? Are the terms “concerning for” and “considering” equal to the uncertain diagnosis terms “yet to be ruled out”?
