CMS announced changes to reporting therapy services—the biggest operational change for 2013—in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule instead of the OPPS final rule. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain the changes to therapy reporting and molecular pathology coding.
So far, we’ve covered three different ICD-10-PCS guidelines for multiple procedures. We’ve looked at how to report multiple procedures involving: Same root operation, different body parts as defined...
Happy 2013! We survived the Mayan apocalypse and received a one-year extension on ICD-10 implementation (which according to some people is more of an apocalyptic event than 12-21-12). Where do your...
In this month's issue, we review the major changes to OPPS for 2013, discuss the potential impact of CMS' packaging clarification, examine therapy, molecular pathology changes, offer suggestions on how to begin teaching providers to speak ICD-10, and answer your coding questions.
As part of the 2013 OPPS final rule, CMS finalized a clarification to 42 CFR 419.2(b) that could cause confusion in the future if hospitals are audited by third-party payers or by Medicare contractors who do not fully understand the intent of the language or how CMS develops payment rates, says Jugna Shah, MPH, president of Nimitt Consulting based in Washington, D.C.
The biggest operational change for outpatient facilities for 2013 does not appear in the 2013 OPPS final rule. Instead, CMS announced changes to reporting therapy services in the 2013 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) final rule.
After a six-month delay, the Recovery Auditor prepayment review demonstration program began in August 2012. The program continues through August 2015, at which point CMS will determine the potential for a national rollout.
Hospitals earned a big win with drug payments this year in the 2013 OPPS final rule, released November 1. CMS decided to finalize its proposal to follow the statute and reimburse facilities at the average sales price (ASP) plus 6%.
After a six-month delay, the Recovery Auditor prepayment review demonstration program began in August 2012. The program continues through August 2015, at which point CMS will determine the potential for a national rollout.
Providers and coders seem to speak two different languages-clinical and coding. Providers already have issues parsing ICD-9-CM "coder speak," so how can you get them to understand ICD-10?
Upon quick glance, the FY 2013 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting probably look very familiar to coders. They're comparable in length to the ICD-9-CM guidelines. They also follow the same format.
The holiday presents have all been unwrapped, and while the children were (mostly) thrilled by their gifts, their parents aren’t as pleased with what happened once the kids started playing with them...
Q: Is nursing documentation of completion of physician-ordered procedures, such as splinting/strapping, Foley catheter insertion, etc., sufficient to assign a CPT ® code for billing the procedure on the facility side in the ED?
As part of the 2013 OPPS final rule, CMS finalized a clarification to 42 CFR 419.2(b) concerning packaged services. Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie Rinkle, MPA, explain how this clarification could cause confusion in the future if hospitals are audited by third-party payers or by Medicare contractors who do not fully understand the intent of the language or how CMS develops payment rates.
Coders will find significant changes in the medicine section of the 2013 CPT® Manual . Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H, and Georgeann Edford, RN, MBA, CCS-P, review the changes to nerve conduction studies, vaccine administration, ophthalmology, and allergy testing.
CMS recently posted an updated version of the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) manual to the CMS NCCI website . The manual includes changes identified in red text and will be effective with dates of service January 1, 2013.
The AMA added new CPT ® codes to report transcatheter aortic valve replacement for 2013. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, details these and other code changes for cardiology.
‘Tis the day before Christmas and all are not well at North Pole Industries. Ernie the head elf has lost his grip, literally. Ernie, it seems, can’t hold on to the toys he’s building. When he goes to...
It’s the end of the world as we know it and the people in the Fix ‘Em Up Clinic waiting room don’t feel fine. Apparently some people really believed that today would be the end of the world and their...
Moderation is not a term usually associated with the holiday season, as you can see from the waiting room at Fix ‘Em Up Clinic. Clark spent two days stringing holiday lights over everything: his tree...
ICD-10-PCS introduces plenty of new concepts. One that could cause coder confusion involves how to report a procedure when the physician changes the approach. The ICD-10-PCS guidelines state: If...
Nervous or worried about the upcoming transition to ICD-10-PCS? Don’t be. Charlotte Lane, RHIA, CCS, and Melanie Endicott, MBA/HCM, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, offer up tips to reduce your anxiety about the new coding system.
ICD-10-CM Chapter 19 codes for injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes (S00-T88) demonstrate the specificity inherent in the new coding system. Betsy Nicoletti, MS, CPC, and Shannon McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CCDS, dig into the details of codes for injuries and underdosing.
Q: A patient has unintentionally failed to take a prescribed dosage of insulin due to his Alzheimer’s dementia (age-related debility), and is admitted for initial care with inadequately controlled Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Which ICD-10-CM code(s) should we assign?
In a recent CMS email to providers, the agency reminded hospitals that any department, form, template, or other information that uses ICD-9-CM codes today will need to accommodate ICD-10-CM/PCS codes as of October 1, 2014.
In order to assign the correct ICD-10-PCS code, coders will need to determine the correct root operation. Christina Benjamin, MA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, discusses the various root operations found in the medical and surgical section of ICD-10-PCS.
When you search the 2013 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting you will find chapter-specific guidelines for each chapter except for Chapters 3, 8, and 12. Chapter 1: Certain...
We’ve already discussed one of the multiple procedure guidelines in ICD-10-PCS, but we still have three more to go. And that’s not counting the guidelines that are not included in the multiple...
Q: CPT ® code 85660 (sickling of RBC, reduction) has a medically unlikely edit of one unit. We test blood for transfusion for sickle cell before we provide it to a sickle cell patient. If we test three units of blood prior to administering the blood to the patient, which modifier is more appropriate: -59 (distinct procedural service) or -91 (repeat laboratory test)?
Misusing modifier -25 (significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management (E/M) service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) can be an expensive proposition. Sarah L. Goodman, MBA, CHCAF, CPC-H, CCP, FCS, and Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, explain how to determine when an E/M service is significant and separately identifiable.
Five new CPT ® codes will be used to report services in two new evaluation and management categories: complex chronic care coordination services and transitional care management services. Shelley C. Safian, PhD, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-I, details the codes and guidelines for these services.
As tempting as it might be to append modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) to a claim in order to get paid, doing so poses a huge compliance risk. Karna W. Morrow, CPC, RCC, CCS-P, Sarah L. Goodman, MBA, CHCAF, CPC-H, CCP, FCS , Peggy Blue, MPH, CPC, CCS-P, and Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, walk through five case studies to help coders chose the correct modifier.
It’s the second week of deer camp and all the hunters are at Fix ‘Em Up Clinic. Moe came into the clinic with some serious frostbite. Apparently, he fell asleep in the latrine at the camp and spent...
The multiple procedure guidelines in ICD-10-PCS present possibilities for coder confusion. Several guidelines relate to the coding of multiple procedures, some under the heading of multiple...
Q: As a traveling consultant, I review many types of inpatient hospital records. As hospitals have implemented electronic health records (EHR), I’ve seen documentation worsen. The ability to cut and paste information in the record has compromised coding accuracy. It has also increased the volume of queries, which frustrates physicians. For example, a physician performs a history and physical (H&P) in his or her office one week prior to admitting a patient to the hospital. The first progress note in the EHR—as well as each subsequent progress note—includes the exact same documentation. This documentation, which continues for four days while the patient is in the hospital, is clearly based on the original H&P. Obviously, the documentation has been copied and pasted from one note to another. Even the patient’s vital signs remain exactly the same as they were in the physician’s office. Coders have no way of knowing whether physicians who treat the patient in the hospital agree with any test findings because residents simply cut and paste the results in each subsequent progress note. Residents claim that they do this solely for the attending physician’s convenience. Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists don’t address the problem because they are more focused on determining the accuracy of the MS-DRG. Is there a solution that will keep physicians, coders, and CDI specialists all on the same page?
Recovery Auditors have already begun prepayment audits of MS-DRG 312 (syncope and collapse). Laura Legg, RHIT, CCS, details how hospitals can ensure the appropriate assignment of MS-DRG 312.
Hospitals are approximately two months into the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program that began with Medicare fee-for-service discharges on or after October 1, 2012. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program is also well underway. Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, and Susan Wallace, Med, RHIA, CCS, CDIP, CCDS, explain the important role coded data plays in these and many other quality-of-care-related initiatives.
ICD-10-CM/PCS incorporates laterality, acuity, anatomical specificity, and a slew of additional combination and complication codes. Who will submit queries when this information is missing in a medical record? Will coders or clinical documentation improvement specialists take on this role? Cheryl Ericson, MS, RN, CCDS, CDI-P, and Mary H. Stanfill, MBI, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, FAHIMA, offer suggestions for determining who will submit queries.
Providers will continue to use the same definition of inpatient status that they already know. That’s because despite CMS’ consideration of various provider comments, the agency has not establish new criteria.
Penny arrived at the Stitch ‘Em Up Hospital with a benign growth on her thyroid gland (ICD-10-CM code D35). The growth isn’t causing any functional problems, so we don’t need to report any additional...
Misusing modifier -25 (significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) can be an expensive proposition. Just ask Georgia Cancer Specialists I, a leading oncology practice in Atlanta.
Robert S. Gold, MD, gives coding guidance on primary cardiomyopathy, SIRS, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and conditions during the perinatal period.
In this month's issue, we review correct use of modifier -25, walk through observation case studies, discuss the pros and cons of dual coding in preparation for ICD-10, review the supervision decisions of the Hospital Outpatient Payment Panel and CMS, and answer your coding questions.
