Kimberly Cunningham, CPC, CIC, CCS , and other professionals comment on commonly seen MS-DRGs and inpatient conditions, including which terms coders need to look for in documentation to arrive at the most accurate MS-DRG and codes. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Anatomical CPT modifiers aren’t used just to distinguish laterality. Susan E. Garrison, CHCA, CHCAS, CCS-P, CHC, PCS, FCS, CPAR, CPC, CPC-H, reviews how to report modifiers –LC, -LD, -LM, -RC, and –RI for percutaneous coronary interventions.
CMS recently announced changes to require providers to report modifier -JW (drug amount discarded/not administered to any patient) when appropriate. Jugna Shah, MPH, looks at when providers will need to use the modifier and how to remain compliant.
The value modifier is having an increasing effect on physician payments and coding each patient’s severity is key to accuracy. Richard D. Pinson, MD, FACP, CCS, writes about how the value modifier impacts payment and conditions coders should be aware of that quality scores.
Providers should already be aware they will have to report more specific ICD-10-CM codes when CMS ends its grace period for physicians later this year, but the agency will also be excluding certain unspecified codes from reporting in 2017.
Shannon Newell, RHIA, CCS , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer discusses modifications and expansions to claims-based quality and cost outcome measures in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS, Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS, Laurie Prescott, MSN, RN, CCDS, and Gloryanne Bryant, BS, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCDS, all comment on how over-querying is a common concern in clinical document improvement, and how over-querying can cause delays in documentation and coding processes.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule includes updates to payment rates and quality initiatives, but some of the most extensive changes pertain to proposals for certain MS-DRG classifications and relative weights.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule released April 27 is replete with modifications and expansions to claims-based quality and cost outcome measures. Although many of these proposed changes are for future fiscal years, ICD-10 codes reported for current discharges will impact the future financial performance for our organizations.
On April 18, CMS issued its anticipated IPPS proposed rule for FY 2017. This year's proposed rule is very dense, including multiple coding fixes and updates, changes to payment provisions, quality updates, and even something for utilization review.
As healthcare providers increasingly accept financial risk associated with patient management due to the transition from fee-for-service to risk-/value-based reimbursement, the traditional model of healthcare reimbursement has been flipped upside down.
CMS' coding modifiers are not always used to report clinical components of a service. Sometimes they can be used in order to provide information about how a service relates to Medicare coverage policies.
The April 2016 I/OCE update brought a host of code and status indicator changes, as well as corrections to CMS' large January update that instituted policies and codes from the 2016 OPPS final rule.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule addresses MS-DRG classifications and relative weights pertaining to categories such as Excision of ileum, Bypass procedures of the veins, Removal and Replacement of knee joints, and pacemaker procedure code combinations.
Q: I have a patient with stage IV lung cancer that presented with fatigue, cough, and loss of appetite. Initially, they thought he had pulmonary nodular amyloidosis, but when they did an echocardiogram on day one they found a pericardial effusion. How would this be sequenced and coded?
Coders can choose from a variety of anatomic modifiers to report procedures performed on specific toes. Review how to properly apply these modifiers and which codes they cannot be reported with.
CMS recently released its seventh maintenance update for National Coverage Determinations to incorporate ICD-10 and other coding updates, which may require providers to contact Medicare Administrative Contractors regarding previously submitted claims.
CMS’ April I/OCE update includes numerous code and status indicator changes, as well as corrections to its January release. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC, looks at the changes providers should review to ensure claims including these codes are processed correctly.
Q: Are there any new HCPCS codes for recently released biosimilar products on the horizon? Our physicians and pharmacists are being contacted by the manufacturer about purchasing and using them, but we want to be sure we can report them appropriately.
Obesity is a condition that can complicate coding for other diagnoses in a patient’s record. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about how to report BMI and what must be documented in order to link it with other conditions.
Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, reviews scenarios for initial, subsequent, and sequela encounters, and helps coders better understand how to assign seventh characters for each type of encounter. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, writes about the many changes in the 2017 IPPS proposed rule, and explains how almost everyone could be affected by CMS’ proposals.
The FY 2017 IPPS proposed rule addresses MS-DRG classifications and relative weights pertaining to the categories of other cardiothoracic procedures without MCC, and injuries, poisonings and toxic effects of drugs.
The American Health Information Management Association has officially responded to proposed ICD-10-CM/PCS codes that were presented at the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting held in March by CMS.
Which services should clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists target in outpatient facilities? Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP , writes about how outpatient CDI differs from inpatient CDI and how it can be applied in hospitals or physician practices.
Modifier –GA isn’t the only modifier available to report how services may relate to Medicare coverage policies in hospitals. Learn more about how to properly report modifiers –GX, -GY, and -GZ.
CMS’ coding modifiers are not always used to report clinical components of a service. Sometimes they can be used in a hospital to provide information about how a service relates to Medicare coverage policies.
Sepsis isn’t the only clinical condition with an updated definition that could impact coding and documentation. A task force of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel recently changed terminology related to pressure ulcers that includes new terms that are not yet part of ICD-10-CM.
Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, discusses strategies for reporting, and better understanding, pyeloplasty in ICD-10-PCS. Note: To access this free article, make sure you first register if you do not have a paid subscription.
Robert S. Gold, MD, writes about important changes made in hypertension since ICD-9-CM, and helps coders better understand the relatively complex diagnosis.
Q: We are currently using a hybrid medical record, so we have standard query forms with multiple-choice options that cannot be modified at this time. We wanted to include a statement so our query doesn’t seem leading. Is our approach to the multiple-choice query format appropriate?
With a widespread lack of awareness of national best practice guidelines for malnutrition, Joannie Crotts, RN, BSN, CPC , and Szilvia Kovacs, MS, RD, LDN , explain how identifying and diagnosing the condition is often still difficult, and how important changes can be made to improve a facility’s malnutrition program.
CMS issued the fiscal year 2017 IPPS proposed rule on April 18, and has proposed changes to the Medicare Code Editor software program based on numerous provider requests.
In February 2016, just four months after ICD-10 go-live, sister publication HIM Briefings (formerly Medical Records Briefing ) asked a range of healthcare professionals to weigh in on their productivity in ICD-9 versus ICD-10.
Clinical documentation and coding has a significant impact on value-based quality outcome performance. Such outcomes include risk-adjusted mortality, readmission, patient safety, complication rates, and cost efficiency measures.
ICD-10 has brought us I10 (essential [primary] hypertension). Some of us thought "That's a relief," while some of us thought "That's a travesty." I am one of the latter.
Last year, as ICD-10 implementation approached, organizations throughout the U.S. reported varying levels of comfort with regard to readiness and understanding of the impact of ICD-10 on physician workflow. For some, it was business as usual. For other physicians, ICD-10 became one more check box on the list of reasons to leave practice.
CMS proposed an extensive five-year, two-phase plan to overhaul Part B drug payments for physicians and hospitals in March outside of the normal OPPS rulemaking cycle that could be implemented as early as this fall.
Few in the healthcare industry would argue that the way the government currently pays for drugs is the most cost-effective, efficient, and equitable method possible.
Q: Our providers are reluctant to document a correlation between symptoms and a true diagnosis. Do you have any good ways to get them to do this? For example, our providers document "diabetes" but they often don't include additional details that should be there (e.g., gestational diabetes or type II diabetes mellitus in pregnancy).
Jugna Shah, MPH, looks at CMS’ new proposal to implement a new drug payment model for certain providers and how they can comment in order to the agency about its impact on their facilities.
