When the Quality Improvement Organizations (QIO) took over the role of education and enforcement for the 2-midnight rule on October 1, 2015, many anticipated that their reviews would only look at records from that date forward, but some hospitals have reported QIO record requests zeroing in on cases as far back as May 2015 and requesting charts for inpatient-only surgeries.
Under the CJR, which began April 1, acute care hospitals in selected geographic areas assume quality and payment accountability for retrospectively calculated bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) episodes. Episodes begin with admission to an acute care hospital for an LEJR procedure that is paid under the IPPS through MS-DRGs 469 or 470 (Major joint replacement or reattachment of lower extremity with or without MCC, respectively) and end 90 days after the date of discharge from the hospital.
There have been some significant changes in documentation needs for diseases of the brain since October 2015. These can affect accurate patient data as well as providing information for the treatment needs of the patients both during a hospital stay and afterwards. They will enable patient information to be available to all providers and ensure that you get paid appropriately for the complexity of the patients under your care.
The new modifier -PO (services, procedures, and/or surgeries furnished at off-campus provider-based outpatient departments [PBD]) and the alternative payment provisions under the Bipartisan Budget Act Section 603 are both related to off-campus PBDs but define "off-campus PBD" slightly differently.
In February 2016, just four months after ICD-10 go-live, sister publication HIM Briefings (formerly Medical Records Briefing ) asked a range of healthcare professionals to weigh in on their productivity in ICD-9 versus ICD-10.
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)¹ as published on February 23 in the Journal of the American Medical Association represents a radical departure from the prior sepsis definitions in 1991² (identified as Sepsis-1) and 2001³ (identified as Sepsis-2) and subsequent Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines through 2015.
Providers need to keep more in mind than just diagnosis and procedure coding when performing sterilizations for men and women. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, reviews the requirements for sterilizations and the part coders can play in avoiding denials.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new guidance last week with updated clinical recommendations for patients exposed to the Zika virus and also announced a registry for pregnant women infected with the virus.
Respondents to HCPro’s 2016 ICD-10 survey share their challenges and successes since implementation, while Monica Pappas, RHIA, and Darice M. Grzybowski, MA, RHIA, FAHIMA, offer their thoughts on the impact of ICD-10.
ICD-10 implementation represented an unprecedented challenge for the U.S. healthcare system. Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, writes about the impact of the change by looking at survey results that compare ICD-10 productivity benchmarks to ICD-9-CM.
Q: What is the proper ICD-10-CM coding for bilateral hip pain? Should we report M25.551 (pain in right hip) and M25.552 (pain in left hip) or M25.559 (pain in unspecified hip)?
Q: Can you clarify the expectations related to documenting the discussion between a physician and a clinical documentation improvement specialist when a query is done verbally? The 2013 ACDIS/AHIMA physician query practice brief Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice expanded on the need to document this interaction and we’re wondering if our process is compliant.
On March 9 and 10, CMS held the ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting to discuss approving changes, additions, and other modifications to the ICD-10 code set.
Barbara A. Anderson, RN, MSM, says that in 2014, 66% of 318 hospitals surveyed by AHIMA had a CDI program in place. Anderson explains how CDI programs can be a valuable bridge between clinical care and coding at hospitals, and gives examples on how to improve upon a facility’s program.
Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes about key details in documentation that coders will need to look for in order to report procedures using the root operation Dilation.
The AHA's Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS , Third Quarter 2015, opens with a discussion of the differences between excisional and non-excisional debridement-diagnoses with a long history of coding and clinical documentation confusion, explains Sharme Brodie, RN, CCDS.
Cyndi Pickney, DO, FACP explains that as ICD-10 implementation approached last year, organizations reported varying levels of readiness and understanding of the impact on physician workflow, and now, there are unforeseen consequences.
Q: Our physicians sign off on diagnoses that the nursing staff prepares on admission of a new patient, can you suggest a process to capture all relevant diagnoses?
According to the American Hospital Association’s 2015 fourth quarter RACTrac survey, the most commonly cited reason for a Recovery Auditor’s complex claim denial is due to an inpatient coding error.
Shelley C. Safian, PhD, RHIA, CCS-P, COC, CPC-I , and AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer, writes that reporting imaging, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy procedures will dramatically change depending upon whether the patient has been admitted into a hospital or is being cared for as an outpatient
A recent Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists poll says that 53% of respondents are not experiencing any real problems with ICD-10-CM/PCS, but coding experts have identified a few tricky diagnoses for coders to be aware of.
Implementation of electronic health record (EHR) systems can reduce queries and create more standardized documentation for providers, but now, according to a study published by the Journal of Patient Safety , EHRs are also linked to fewer in-hospital patient complications.
Q: When a foreign body is removed from the eye, does it matter what instrumentation is used to remove it? We recently had two cases in which the ED physician stated that the foreign body was easily removed with a cotton swab. She is questioning whether we should charge (facility and professional) for this type of removal or whether it should just be considered when determining the E/M level.
Drug administration services follow a hierarchy for reporting, but coding can become complex when providers administer multiple drugs. Review these tips to help tackle tough injection and infusion scenarios.
Reporting modifier –PO (services, procedures, and/or surgeries furnished at off-campus provider-based outpatient departments) only recently became mandatory, but new rules and regulations could change the requirements in certain settings. Kimberly Anderwood Hoy Baker, JD, CPC, reviews recent legislation that could have an impact on modifier –PO and looks ahead to when CMS intends to offer more guidance.
The Zika virus has become a major concern over the last couple months and new information about treatment and symptoms seems to emerge daily. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about the latest information regarding the Zika virus and how coders can report it.
Remember, the hierarchy applies to all IV injection and infusion services. Chemotherapy services are primary and should be selected as initial when provided in conjunction with therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic services.
The root operation identifies the intent of the procedure. It is identified in the third character of the ICD-10-PCS code. ICD-10-PCS guideline A.11 states that the coder is responsible for selecting the root operation that most closely matches the intent of the procedure.
The AHA's Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2015, opens with a discussion of the differences between excisional and non-excisional debridement‑diagnoses with a long history of coding and clinical documentation confusion.
The 2016 CPT® code update may have been relatively small compared to previous years, but the urinary and genital system sections did receive numerous changes to align them with other sections of the code book.
Since the dinosaurs roamed the earth (OK, since 1983), coding professionals have been tasked with ensuring that bills for Medicare patients included the proper elements of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system so that the hospital got as much money as possible from Medicare.
This month's column is all about data--the importance of providers reporting accurate and complete data, as well as CMS having complete, accurate, and consistent data to compute future payment rates.
For years, coding professionals have been tasked with ensuring that bills for Medicare patients include the proper elements of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) in order to try to accurately show a patient’s severity, but, as Robert S. Gold, MD , writes, there is much more to coding than DRG maximization.
Q: In the past few weeks, we noticed physicians are documenting acute congestive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction instead of diastolic or systolic. They say the heart failure is not diastolic or systolic. What is the best way to approach this issue?
CMS administers the Medicare program and it is currently the single largest payer for healthcare in the United States. Medicare Part A, B, C, and D, all encompass a wide variety of services, all of which providers need to understand to determine which services are covered for patients.
Allen Frady, RN, BSN, CCS, CCDS , and Gwen S. Regenwether, BSN, RN , combat coders’ and clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists’ querying bad habits, and show how to support productivity and revenue flow for the facility.
The mosquito-borne illness known as Zika virus still has unanswered questions surrounding the illness its self, but thanks to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an official ICD-10-CM diagnosis code has been assigned to the virus.
Specialty groups are often able to move faster on creating guidelines for new procedures and codes than other ruling bodies. But sometimes this guidance can create conflicts between physician and facility coders. Lori-Lynne A. Webb, CPC, CCS-P, CCP, CHDA, COBGC, CDIP, writes about how to avoid these scenarios and come to the best resolution for providers, payers, and patients.
Q: If a physician orders a consultation for a patient who is experiencing a headache due to hypertension, which ICD-10-CM codes would be assigned? Would hypertension be coded since headache is a common sign and symptom of hypertension, or would both the headache and hypertension be coded?
CMS recently announced a delay in the anticipated system release of outpatient and inpatient quality reporting data due to the relocation of the Health Care Quality Information System Data Center responsible for the Hospital Quality Reporting programs.
CPT codes for drug administration follow a hierarchy that is unique to those procedures. Review the hierarchy in order to understand how to apply codes for any type of scenario.
